jeil said:Only it was in art class and he had drawn a picture of a soldier in Iraq shooting a rifle.
He was told by the principle that pictures of guns cannot be drawn in school, and sent back to class; end of story.
He is my grandson, so I doubt seriously that they will have much success in demonizing guns in his mind, but you can see how the anti gun mentatility is perpetuated for children who do not have family to counterbalance the government line. You can see also why government wants to control education.
jeil said:Only it was in art class and he had drawn a picture of a soldier in Iraq shooting a rifle.
He was told by the principle that pictures of guns cannot be drawn in school, and sent back to class; end of story.
He is my grandson, so I doubt seriously that they will have much success in demonizing guns in his mind, but you can see how the anti gun mentatility is perpetuated for children who do not have family to counterbalance the government line. You can see also why government wants to control education.
Hockeydude said:I'm a junior in HS and my AP English teacher is a Marxist. No matter what book we read, she always finds a way the working class is getting screwed. Then she told us that The Nation is a good magazine.
Part of the school's initial phase of imposing a consistent policy should also be the exclusion of George Washington and other Presidents who are depicted with or associated with guns. That list includes most U.S. Presidents, I believe, including Andrew Jackson (U.S. Army), Harry S Truman (U.S. Army), Dwight D. Eisenhower (U.S. Army), John F. Kennedy (U.S. Navy), and Jimmy Carter (U.S. Navy). The school should not inform students about those Presidents because there are graphic representations of them armed: pupils are likely to see at least some of those representations and believe that the school approves of those gun toting Presidents.
You might be a redneck if your kid's teacher asks your son, "Did you get your elk?"
Zen21Tao said:I wonder if he would have been sent to the principal if he drew a picture of a criminal stabbing an unarmed person (and write "no gun" next to the peron being stabbed).
This is a prime example of liberals demonizing a "thing" rather than focusing on the person using the "thing."
Wow...with romantic lines like that I am suprised the ladies aren't all over you..ya silver tongued devil.mordechaianiliewicz said:If I should convince some poor woman to breed with me, I think home schooling or a rural district would be ideal
Hockeydude said:I'm a junior in HS and my AP English teacher is a Marxist. No matter what book we read, she always finds a way the working class is getting screwed. Then she told us that The Nation is a good magazine.
KriegHund said:\
Oh, and confederate flags are banned in my school too. I wouldnt personally siplay one, but i think you ought to be allowed to.
Here, here...but not just about taxes and tarrifs. Also about shipping lanes and industrial manufacturing. I would say slavery was only about 20% of it.Otherguy Overby said:Yeah, the Star&Bars, the Conferderate battle flag. The civil war was about taxes and tariffs. Lincoln didn't play the "race" card until 1862 when the North appeared to be losing the war.