Boba Fett
Member
Perusing Burris' website, I came across the Shotcam.
The application that caught my eye was:
My opinion is, it could go both ways. I can see the footage being good for your defense and bad for your defense. Ultimately, I think it would cause people more legal problems than it would help.
That and the darn think is terribly bulky looking on a pistol. Now, for their other applications, I think it might be nice. Mount it on the front of your AR-15 and have fun. Or mount it on your rifle when you go hunting and record you kill.
So, what do you all think?
The moment you unholster, the Shotcam™ automatically begins recording high-quality digital video and audio of events as they occur. Every visual detail, every sound, every action is documented for later analysis.
The encrypted video/audio supercedes any questionable, conflicting or biased eyewitness accounts and can dramatically reduce personal, departmental and jurisdictional liability.
Footage can also be used to help identify suspects who have managed to flee the scene. And the Shotcam, when removed from a weapon, can continue to provide video, still frames and audio of a crime scene and witnesses.
The application that caught my eye was:
Liability concerns do not start and stop with law enforcement. ShotCam
can provide your best evidence when presenting your self-defense
arguments in court.
My opinion is, it could go both ways. I can see the footage being good for your defense and bad for your defense. Ultimately, I think it would cause people more legal problems than it would help.
That and the darn think is terribly bulky looking on a pistol. Now, for their other applications, I think it might be nice. Mount it on the front of your AR-15 and have fun. Or mount it on your rifle when you go hunting and record you kill.
So, what do you all think?
Last edited: