Sig vs glock
BOTH ARE GOOD GUNS OVERALL. Sigs are however, the choice among professionals and government agencies for a reason. "field tests, maintenance history and superior performance". Everyone knows when govt agencies have to purchase something the sale goes to the lowest bidder. If that were "always the case", special forces, homeland security and all law enforcement agencies would be carrying glocks and not Sigs. Some local law enforcement agencies do carry glocks because of the cost issue. Sigs are almost twice as much. My only issue with glocks is the plastic coated magazines. If you don't properly align it when inserting it into the weapon you "will scratch and put burs in the plastic coating which will prevent the mag from dropping when you press the mag release". I've witnessed this 1st hand in competition. The 1st generation glocks would not even drop a loaded mag much less and empty one, though that was corrected. It's just not something I would want in a combat pistol. You want to eject empty mags when they're empty and not have to pull them out when "time is of the essence in putting rounds on target!" I WOULD BUY A GLOCK IF I COULDN'T AFFORD A SIG.