1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Solid vs. fixed tele-stock for AR

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by dukefan70, Dec 13, 2009.

  1. dukefan70

    dukefan70 Well-Known Member

    First, living in the Communist Commonwealth of MA we aren't allowed to have telescoping stocks on anything. What they do sell are the tele- style stock in a fixed position on ARs, etc. I've handled but not fired an AR with the fixed tele-stock and have NOT handled a solid stock AR. Looking to buy an AR.

    Question: For those who have shot ARs both with and w/out a tele-stock (fixed or not), which did you like better for the weight difference and the feel?
  2. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Well-Known Member

    There is no conceivable reason to buy a fixed telescoping stock unless YOU got to choose where it was fixed.

    I personalty don't like em even unfixed, but I can see their place with shooters of diffrent size
  3. Quentin

    Quentin Well-Known Member

    It's hard to pick a favorite, it depends on the balance of the rifle in the first place (carbine, rifle, HBar, pencil, etc.) On a carbine I like either the telestock or A1 fixed stock, preferring the former if it's not pinned. The A2 stock is too long for me.
  4. janobles14

    janobles14 Well-Known Member

    i like the feel of the fixed stocks. however, i do enjoy the lightness of the telescopic stocks. now i dont think i would ever have a need for a fixed position tele type stock. it might be the same light weight but would take away the other advantages.
  5. dukefan70

    dukefan70 Well-Known Member

    good point bout the type...shoulda mentioned that. Hbar is kinda doubtful unless ordered since colts are pre ban (1994) in MA. Also flash suppressors are illegal here too but I've been told that .223 burns out in 14 in. anyway so I might just go for the carbine. I have a shotty for HD but I guess if anybody wants to throw around some good middle of the road barrel lengths for range or HD or all practical purposes I'm all ears.
  6. Eaglecreekbrewer

    Eaglecreekbrewer Well-Known Member

    The pro and cons of the fixed vs. telescopic stocks are pretty much eliminated when it doesn't move. You have better support and cheek weld on a fixed standard stock. Why subject yourself to the cons when you can't experience the pro's?
  7. highorder

    highorder Well-Known Member

    I swapped a tele-stock for an A2 stock today.

    Cheekweld is the name of the game.
  8. fungusmunkey

    fungusmunkey Member

    I prefer fixed over Tele's myself.

    I like the ACE ARFX series.
  9. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Fixed A2 stock for shooting because of way better cheek-weld..

    Tele's for looking Tackycool, unless you wear body armor a lot.
    Then the adjustble length is a big plus.

  10. Zach S

    Zach S Well-Known Member

    I like the M4 stocks because an A2 is too long, entry stocks are too short, and sully stocks are expensive. My 5.56 hasn't moved in years since my wife didn't shoot it. She did mess with the 9mm and .22 stocks, but I doubt they'll get moved much since she's gone.

    CMMG does this, I dont know of anyone else does.
  11. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    I have to say the longer I shoot and take classes with ARs the less need I find I have for telescoping stocks.

    I notice that I tend to set them to one length and never mess with it again.

    My SBR has a CAR-15 short stock on it and I love it. Took off a Magpul M93 and put the shorty stock on about a year ago.

    ETA: Picture

    Attached Files:

    • SBR.jpg
      File size:
      328.5 KB
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
  12. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    i agree with texas. i have collapsible stocks on all of my ARs except for my HP/CMP Service Rifle, and all of the stocks are 1 or 2 positions from fully-collapsed. i leave them there and don't mess with them. i kinda wish they were fixed at that position.

    that m93 is a collector item... you should hang on to it
  13. W.E.G.

    W.E.G. Well-Known Member

    It depends entirely on what you are using it for.

    For competition and precision shooting, I prefer the fixed stock.

    For transit in close quarters, and for getting in-and-out of vehicles, or for shooting under conditions requiring heavy clothing and/or pack-straps, the collapsible stock is very much superior.

    Substitute a shorter barrel for even more portability, and less weight.
  14. alemonkey

    alemonkey Well-Known Member

    Interesting discussion, I'm thinking of building an AR next year and I'm trying to decide what kind of stock to use. Does anyone have experience with the Ace ARFX fixed stock? I really like the looks of that one.
  15. briansmithwins

    briansmithwins Well-Known Member

    Fixed A1 stocks for me.

    Fits better than the A2 and fewer parts to go wrong. BSW
  16. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Well-Known Member

    I would definitely choose a fixed A2 stock over a fixed telestock.

    However, I would, and have, chosen an ACE ARFX over an A2 or telestock, and really prefer it to either. If that were not an option I would also take an A1 buttstock over an A2.
  17. YaNi

    YaNi Well-Known Member

    If you go with a telescopic stock make sure you get a stock that doesn't rattle. The telescopic stock and hang guard that came on my Bushy M4gery rattled and made the gun feel like a cheap toy. I replaced them with a Magpul CTR stock and DPMS free float hand guard and all is well. Apparently its a crapshoot if you go with the M4 stock as to whether you get a good one or not.
  18. Mags

    Mags Well-Known Member

    If I lhad to live in a communist regime like yourself I would get this. My understanding is that it is a fixed "adjustable" stock. Please correct me if your regime I mean state does not allow it I would not know since I live in a state that doesn't care about my length of pull.
  19. Maverick223

    Maverick223 Well-Known Member

    Mags, I think you are wrong about the Magpul, but living in a free state (well somewhat) I am not positive. OTOH I think the Magpul PRS should be fine as it only adjusts about an inch. It would be my choice as it can be fitted to the shooter.

  20. Tirod

    Tirod Well-Known Member

    Adjustable length of pull is pretty moot for the civilian shooter. Other than winter vs. summer, lenth of pull doesn't vary much. Shooting with armor and battle gear on is a rare situation.

    As far as use of a weapon in vehicles, a short stock is nice for military/LEO, but again, civilians have little need other than patrolling their own acreage on a ranch, etc. What a soldier needs to do on the streets of Kandahar isn't recommended in the parking lot of McD's.

    The Sully runs about $125, which some find expensive. In a world of $150 SOPMOD stocks, not so much. It's a good length, extremely durable, gives a good cheek weld, won't make noise, and follows the principle of KISS. Very few weekend shooters need 6 position stocks with battery storage or multiple sling mounts. They just want them for looks.

    Avoid the psuedo look and just use a fixed.

Share This Page