Now, this is not exactly a debate on which gun is better. Instead, this is more about their technical specs, if such things are comparable.
Whenever someone discusses or looks up an AR, you have a vast arsenal of topics regarding many things that go into the process of making one: MPI and HPT of certain parts, barrel steel and blend, receiver forging, etc. etc. All of which paints the AR as a pretty, precision-engineered marvel of firearms science.
But...
...what the hell is an AK made out of? Surely it is not made out of weak steel, crappy, improperly prepared chrome, plywood, and the tears of children and political dissidents working towards their death in Siberian gulags like the manual makes it out to be (disclaimer: I'm not actually sure on whether or not it says that).
But seriously, what are the various parts of an AK made of? How different is the manufacturing process? If the parts are of lesser grade, then why is it that AKs seem to last forever while people share horror stories of even quality ARs failing?
Whenever someone discusses or looks up an AR, you have a vast arsenal of topics regarding many things that go into the process of making one: MPI and HPT of certain parts, barrel steel and blend, receiver forging, etc. etc. All of which paints the AR as a pretty, precision-engineered marvel of firearms science.
But...
...what the hell is an AK made out of? Surely it is not made out of weak steel, crappy, improperly prepared chrome, plywood, and the tears of children and political dissidents working towards their death in Siberian gulags like the manual makes it out to be (disclaimer: I'm not actually sure on whether or not it says that).
But seriously, what are the various parts of an AK made of? How different is the manufacturing process? If the parts are of lesser grade, then why is it that AKs seem to last forever while people share horror stories of even quality ARs failing?