Stiicky: Trolls and what Value ? + Poll on

[Geo.Az]

...First some Facts: the HIGHROAD Forum... Members 58,667.... Active 12,050

" My Bias Prospective on Trolls:.... A Person ( Anon ) of NO VALUE. "

There are to many Trolls on this Board......... O.K. What is a Troll ? My Bias Opinion 3 Types or more. All Post from Anons. ( When People realize there Is no Ano-mity - they Know Who We are ) Only Men who have Balls Post Names or Handles..... 1st - type of troll a Sh t Disturber who Disrupts People and Boards Likes to do mind trips on People..... 2nd - Mean People who like to put down Others for Sport, Character Assassination, Snipe Posts. ( same type like to watch Dog Fighting ) 3rd are people working for Gov. to discredit a Board any Board. on DisInformation.

I also know about why Good people post anon - the Fear of being Rediculed or Flamed. ( Life is a learning experance )

I have been Wrong a Lot - ....I/we.... learn from It.

Answer on CWOT - 20 years ago I say a Bio if a Famous Film Director Ford or Houston ( I can not remember any more ) all his Crew would Hate to have to Re shoot a seen over and over up to 6 Times.
and they coined the Word - CWOT- ( Complete Waist Of Time )

What the Hell Do I Know ....." Just Passing Through Kiddo Just Passing Through. ".... on my way Out. Geo.Az
ps.... yes I know don't let the door hit me.....

 

[siglite]

[removed by author]

 

[elrod]

Speaking of Trolls!

 

[igpoobah]

You can't even post here anonymously....I'm lost...

 

[igpoobah]

double

 

[OAKVILLE SHOOTER]

I got lost somewhere in the middle...or was it the begining, I am not sure.

 

[OAKVILLE SHOOTER]

Now that the poll is up, I still don't quite understand!!

 

[mustanger98]

Re: "CWOT"

That director was probably Houston because Maureen O'Hara talked about how John Ford didn't like to re-shoot scenes over and over and over. It wasn't just that it was a CWOT... sometimes it was way too expensive or way too dangerous in the first place. That came up in the chapters on "Rio Grande" and "The Quiet Man".

Speaking of "The Quiet Man", did ya'll notice that Webley MkVI?

 

[Robert Hairless]

Does putting the word "Sticky"--or in this case "Stiicky"--in the subject of a message make it a sticky message? Can anyone do it?

Am I alone in wondering how anyone can consider himself fit to judge other people when he posts a message that says "Only Men who have Balls Post Names or Handles..... 1st - type of troll a Sh t Disturber who Disrupts People and Boards Likes to do mind trips on People....."

 

[MachIVshooter]

Ooooooookay, then.............

 

[igpoobah]

No; and it's not a sticky, it just looks like one....

 

[Gator]

I too have noticed a recent increase in rudeness on THR. I don't know if I'd call them all trolls, or just immature punks, but there sure seem to be a lot of them around.

Carry on Geo!

 

[hankdatank1362]

Old Geo may have some communication issues that he's addressed before, but he's no troll. We are all lucky to have a guy like him posting on this board.

All myou guys suggesting otherwise should look around for some of his past exploits.

 

[siglite]

Old Geo may have some communication issues that he's addressed before, but he's no troll. We are all lucky to have a guy like him posting on this board.

Oh man, now I remember. I'll be editing my original post.

 

[Jorg Nysgerrig]

I'm pretty sure faking a "stiicky"(sic) constitutes trolling.