k_semler
member
bad guys don't have to pilfer old Soviet goods to get stuff to make a dirty bomb.
Dur. A "dirty bomb" involves no nuclear reaction beyond the decay of the natural radioactivity of whatever susbstance you used. It's basically an explosive that pulverizes a radioactive substance to contaminate an area with radiation. No nuclear blast initiates. It is entirely a chemical reaction, (conventional explosives)
A nuclear weapon relies upon nuclear reactions, (splitting or fusing of atoms), to create the mushroom cloud and incredible temperatures. If all you want to do is throw radioactive material into the surrounding environment, but not release the sun's energy on Earth, all you need is access to a hospital BioHazard dumpster, (a pair of bolt cutters will get you that), and look for the international radiation symbol. Then all you need is a medium-strength explosive, (Got deisel?, Ammonium nitrate was first made in 1659 by Johann R. Glauber)
You really don't need that much of radioactive substances. If the gieger counter goes off, the media-induced mass panic will do far more damage then the radiation would ever do. A dirty bomb DOES NOT create a nuclear reaction. If you want a nuke, that's quite complicated, and unless AQ has nuclear engineers and several multi-million dollar facilities, (or buys one from a rouge country), that's a very small risk. Somehow, I highly doubt I'm ever going to see AQ manage to vaporize LA or NY with a 50MT detonation. China, DPRK, Russia, or Iran maybe, but not AQ.