I've worked up 3.7gr WSF behind Bayou 147gr @1.15" OAL as a soft Steel Challenge load for my wife and myself. 3.6gr also works, but is too close to 3.5gr which does not reliably cycle our 9mm 1911s.
Based on a load in the Lyman manual (3.4 WSF (min), 147gr lead @1.058") and in concert with a clerical error I tried 3.4gr/147gr Bayou/1.12" OAL. The rounds were definitely softer, more accurate (likely) and cycled flawlessly. The shorter OAL would up the pressure at the same powder load, but reducing the load by .3gr is significant. Does this combined result at the shorter OAL, lower powder load makes sense?
Update: Chrono Results- the 3.4gr load chrono'ed at about 865fps average with a decent SD. We shot a bunch of this ammo (300 rounds) and it cycled flawlessly. The SD will improve when I switch to a conventional seating die; my micrometer die tends to drift if I don't watch it. This is officially or new to-to load for Steel Challenge until I come up with something better. I'm actually tempted to try 3.3gr.
My baseline load chronos at 900fps. I'm going to chrono the new load on Friday.
Based on a load in the Lyman manual (3.4 WSF (min), 147gr lead @1.058") and in concert with a clerical error I tried 3.4gr/147gr Bayou/1.12" OAL. The rounds were definitely softer, more accurate (likely) and cycled flawlessly. The shorter OAL would up the pressure at the same powder load, but reducing the load by .3gr is significant. Does this combined result at the shorter OAL, lower powder load makes sense?
Update: Chrono Results- the 3.4gr load chrono'ed at about 865fps average with a decent SD. We shot a bunch of this ammo (300 rounds) and it cycled flawlessly. The SD will improve when I switch to a conventional seating die; my micrometer die tends to drift if I don't watch it. This is officially or new to-to load for Steel Challenge until I come up with something better. I'm actually tempted to try 3.3gr.
My baseline load chronos at 900fps. I'm going to chrono the new load on Friday.
Last edited: