Taurus 85 owners sound off

Status
Not open for further replies.
Local gun store had them advertised on sale this week. Got a stainless for $219.99, with the $40 mail in rebate I don't think I did too bad. It does shoot a bit high when I went out and ran 20 rounds through it behind the house, but it is right on left to right.
 
So after reading this thread I decided to check out the model 85 in person. In this case a "black" basic 85 with the steel frame. I specifically say "black" and not "blued" because of the new finish. I compared it to the Ultra-lite Model 85, Smith 642, Polyprotector 85, and an LCR. I came away impressed with the trigger pull of the little steel 85. It was a little lighter than the Smith and shorter than the LCR. I was expecting some grittiness or stacking, but did not find it. I liked the wide smooth face of the trigger itself. The sites are obviously basic, but are sized to leave a little light on either side of the front blade which I like in a sight picture. I checked it for a visually canted barrel, but it seemed true. Lockup on 4 of the chambers felt "Colt tight". The 5th chamber was a little more "S&W tight". The new grip allows a full 3 finger hold (pinky does not dangle). It wraps around the steel of the gun so it should provide a pleasant shooting experience. It's a very soft rubber though, so it will probably hang up on clothing some. I was impressed with the fully-shrouded ejector rod. Overall it just felt solid.

It wasn't the screaming deal that the online shops are offering, but with the rebate I gave in and bought it.

I gave it a good cleaning and checked the barrel/cylinder gap with a feeler gauge. The smallest my gauge goes is 0.006". The gap is tighter than that on all 5 chambers. Nice. With as clean as the newer jacketed .38 special ammo is, I'm not too concerned about fouling.

I even tried out the locking system. It's very simple. There's a "screw" on the back of the hammer that includes a spring ball detent to keep it from turning. It requires a 90 degree turn to back it out far enough that it hits the frame if you try to run the hammer back (i.e. cocking or firing DA). I'll be among the first to say that I hate the lock on Smith revolvers, but this one doesn't look like it will be failure prone. I liked how the revolver could still be loaded/unloaded while locked.

The finish is not pretty. It looks like it was sand blasted and phosphate coated. I just hope it proves corrosion resistant.

The new grip does not have any threaded fasteners holding it in place. It looks like there's a roll pin running through it. So the grip won't be easily removable. I tested it with HKS, Safariland, and 5-Star speed loaders. I don't think the grip was designed with speed loaders in mind. They'll work, but it's tight and there's a good chance of something hanging up.

What is everyone using for a holster? Does anyone know if the fitted plastic J-frame holsters work with the 85's?
 
The new grip does not have any threaded fasteners holding it in place. It looks like there's a roll pin running through it. So the grip won't be easily removable. I tested it with HKS, Safariland, and 5-Star speed loaders. I don't think the grip was designed with speed loaders in mind. They'll work, but it's tight and there's a good chance of something hanging up.

What is everyone using for a holster? Does anyone know if the fitted plastic J-frame holsters work with the 85's?

Hi oss- congrats on the new model 85. I own the SS M85 and love it.

As far as the grips go, if you use the correct size punch to tap the pin out you will be good to go. I removed them to try a variety of grips but believe it or not the Bull grip that came with it felt/functioned the best for me. However right now I have CT laser grips on it.

The grips are not known to work so well with the speed loaders. I'm using speed strips.

Holsters: I use a DeSantis Superfly for pocket carry, a Barsony leather IWB holster and a Ritchie ankle holster
 
I have an alien gear IWB and OWB as well as a Bianchi OWB. Avoid the Bianchi with adjustable retaining snap. It is not a good holster.
 
Well I can give a short range report for the new 85.

The revolver is fine.

I ran a mix of standard pressure AE 130 grain metal case, 158 grain plated HP handloads, and some +P 135gr Gold Dot's, 125 gr Blazer SJHP's, a a couple Winchester PDX1's. The 85 hit the primers with a healthy amount of authority. At 7-10 yards it grouped nicely with all rounds. The 158grain loads hit a little high. The others were right at point of aim. I shot mostly double action and the little revolver behaved as well as any I have shot. Between the weight and the soft rubber grip, recoil wasn't the least bit harsh. I will say that the PDX1's felt a little warmer than the other rounds.

The only smallish issue I could mention is that during ejection, the round closest to the frame would often hang up on the grip. I would have to pick it free with my off hand. It's not a huge issue, but something to be aware of. The LCR I used to own had a clear advantage in this aspect.

I was pleased with how sharp and clear the site picture was. The front site is still just black though. I'm not sure if I'll paint it or not.

The revolver cleaned up well enough, but I'm not sure what to make of the coating on it. If it were traditional bluing I'd wipe it down with some oil. I'm not sure if this is parkerizing, phosphate or something else. Just don't know what the best way to take care of it is.
 
I have two Taurus 85 UL .38 SPL. and a 85 Polymer .38 SPL+P both 5 shots.
 

Attachments

  • 14568168_1136694253075982_3715611220005212648_n.jpg
    14568168_1136694253075982_3715611220005212648_n.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 7
  • 18034010_1314532031958869_1001883232871233666_n.jpg
    18034010_1314532031958869_1001883232871233666_n.jpg
    107.6 KB · Views: 7
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top