DigitalWarrior
Member
When exactly did we try being nice to Iran? Was it installing the puppet dictator, or when we gave Saddam chemical weapons to kill Iranians?
DW
DW
We have plenty of reason to not be nice. A ton of reason. So much reason, being nice to Iran, is just fricking foolish and retarded thinking. It's been tried, it was proved foolish, retarded and fruitless then.
By using diplomatic channels regarding nuclear policy. They told the UN and member nations to stick it where the sun don't shine. Being "nice" to these folks doesn't work. All that's going to get us is a nuclear weaponed Iran. A nuclear Iran is not in our best interest.
'm not mocking, and I think my point was missed. I honestly just want a simple answer. If we're going to go over to Iran and kill Iranians, we need a one-sentence reason why we're doing it. Not just because I want one, but because the American public isn't going to read a doctoral thesis to try to figure out why we're bombing some city across the globe which most people have never heard of.
If we're not going to go across the globe and kill Iranians, then we need to stop supporting candidates who admit on TV that they're ok with the idea of nuking the place.
There's a middle ground here, one between Clintonesque head-in-the-sand appeasement on one side and random invasions or nuclear strikes on the other. RP is the only candidate out there who I hear trying to reach that middle ground.
There's a middle ground here, one between Clintonesque head-in-the-sand appeasement on one side and random invasions or nuclear strikes on the other. RP is the only candidate out there who I hear trying to reach that middle ground.
And I think it's about TIME we support politicians whom our enemies think MIGHT nuke them. That worked better for Reagan than the alternative strategies. Who else has given that impression, since Kennedy?
You defend a Iran, a State Sponser of Terrorism, a country sending people to kill our troops in Iraq but yet convict the USA? I'm ashamed you even compare us to terrorist. I guess it's because you're so caught up with defending Ron Paul on this issue.