.455_Hunter
Member
To what end?
Because there are "certain" types of firearms that have a propensity to having the trigger actuated by whatever method when not intended.
The model of the gun in question would be useful for that assessment.
To what end?
But what difference would that make? Every day, thousands of people successfully carry what some folks on the internet have decided are the "dangerous" types of firearms without incident. Doesn't make much sense to critique the weapon choice of Joe random without knowing anything at all about Joe's training or competence level.Because there are "certain" types of firearms that have a propensity to having the trigger actuated by whatever method when not intended.
The model of the gun in question would be useful for that assessment.
But what difference would that make? Every day, thousands of people successfully carry what some folks on the internet have decided are the "dangerous" types of firearms without incident. Doesn't make much sense to critique the weapon choice of Joe random without knowing anything at all about Joe's training or competence level.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/man-accidentally-fires-gun-in-atlanta-mall-sends-shoppers-fleeing
1. Carry in a holster and with a belt that together provide a solid platform for your firearm so that you don't have to adjust your gun in public. If you carry in a pocket, use a pocket holster that holds the gun securely in the pocket so it doesn't shift around. This will keep you from having to adjust it and it will also keep it positioned so you don't have to fish around for it if you need it.
2. Carry a firearm that is safe and will not fire unless the trigger is pulled and carry it in a holster that covers the trigger and thus prevents it from being fired while holstered.
3. Try your system out at home with an unloaded gun to make sure that everything works as intended.
Unintentionally discharging a firearm in public is not just embarrassing, it's also probably illegal. It is also potentially deadly for others or for the person carrying the gun depending on where the muzzle is pointed.
From the article--a quote by local police: "Instances like this are unacceptable and we expect more from those who choose to carry firearms."
Couldn't have said it better myself.
The article reveals nothing about the person responsible, but reporting "adjusting his pants" means someone saw it, and I'd speculate a phone picture may help the police find him and what actually happened beyond the obvious.
You honestly think that the average gun owner is going to take the time to research those kinds of statistics? Not gonna happen my friend.Actually, it makes complete sense to learn what type of weapons are most frequently involved in AD/ND incidents. Such data could be used to assist Joe's weapon selection instead of just magazine ads and internet talking heads.
I guess maybe I am "too hard" on people who want to carry. I have always thought that if someone can not carry a gun and not touch off rounds they should not carry ANY gun. If they need two or three safeties because they can't handle a gun and not fire it? Then to me they should not carry or carry an auto with nothing in the chamber. See if they could manage to carry an empty chamber and not touch off rounds?Actually, it makes complete sense to learn what type of weapons are most frequently involved in AD/ND incidents. Such data could be used to assist Joe's weapon selection instead of just magazine ads and internet talking heads.
Of course not. Why would gun owners ever want to consider safety when buying a firearm?You honestly think that the average gun owner is going to take the time to research those kinds of statistics? Not gonna happen my friend.
I didn't say they shouldn't consider it, did I? I said that most aren't going to spend time looking at "statistics" (If you can really call them that) regarding the rate at which various types of firearms are accidentally/negligently discharged. Making a statement about what people will or will not do is not the same thing as advocating for them to do or not do that action.Of course not. Why would gun owners ever want to consider safety when buying a firearm?
1. There's nothing in the article that hints that the person was underage or breaking any laws. Why speculate that he was? Because he did something stupid and discharged a firearm in a public place? A person doesn't have to be a criminal to make poor decisions, they don't have to be breaking laws just because they did something foolish.
A while back we had a local yahoo unintentionally discharge his gun into the floor during a church service.
Correct. If he was, what he did was stupid. If he wasn't, what he did was stupid and he was breaking the law too. Either way, the lesson is the same. Don't be stupid. Carrying with a good quality holster that fits the gun and protects the trigger and a good quality belt that fits the loops of the holster is not that hard nor is it that expensive. It's worth every penny.We will probably never know if he was carrying legally or not.
There was an incident some time back where a concealed carrier was having an informal show & tell session at church with his loaded carry gun and ended up shooting himself and his wife. That's not about having the wrong carry rig, that's just about not following the rules of gun safety.Wow, a gun blast in church.
The dumbass needs to have a car safe to store the gun the next time he feels “twitchy” or still uses the wrong holster.