I'm sure that the "fact" that the Thompson "could not be employed at the front" will be big news to the many Marine and Army troops who used every Thompson they could get their hands on at Guadalcanal.
As I recall, both Marine and Army Machine gunners were armed with the Thompson to aid in protecting the gun in the close quarters of jungle warfare.
Another fact is, due to the shortage of Thompson guns, the "hand-me-down" Marines had to use the Reising SMG.
The Reising was also a full-auto .45ACP SMG, and it was also used on the canal, in the front lines.
This sounds very much like something written by somebody who misunderstood or mis-quoted somebody else.
The Thompson makes a deep "thumping" sound.
The Japanese machine guns were widely reported as having a rapid "crackling" sound.
A number of books written by Marine "canal" veterans speak about the sharp "crack" of the 6.5 Japanese round, and the "crackle" of the Nambu machine gun.
One in particular described listening to the heavy fire fight on Edson's Ridge, and hearing "The "chugging sound of the BAR, the "POW" of the 1903 Springfield, the "thumping" roar of the Thompson, the "crack" of the Arisaka rifle, and the "crackling" Nambu machine gun".
Many also wrote about the use of Reising and Thompson gun in the front lines on the canal.