Nightcrawler
Member
I've been thinking about something. As gun technology advanced, the weapons themselves have (generally) gotten less complicated. I mean, think about it.
Compare a modern car to a car from the 1920s. The modern car is much more complicated, and has computers and whatnot in it.
Then compare an AK-47 to a Thompson. The AK is lighter and is mechanically simpler, AFAIK. You see this with a LOT of gun designs. The newest ones have fewer parts and so forth.
It strikes me as something akin to backwards evolution. Does it really take that long to think of the simplest way to accomplish what you want, or are there factors I'm not considering?
I mean, look at all of the contraptions they used for early semiauto rifles, before the Garand was refined, then compare that to the guts of a FAL.
Granted, the later designs are based on experience gained on the earlier ones, and I'll bet that counts for a LOT.
Compare a modern car to a car from the 1920s. The modern car is much more complicated, and has computers and whatnot in it.
Then compare an AK-47 to a Thompson. The AK is lighter and is mechanically simpler, AFAIK. You see this with a LOT of gun designs. The newest ones have fewer parts and so forth.
It strikes me as something akin to backwards evolution. Does it really take that long to think of the simplest way to accomplish what you want, or are there factors I'm not considering?
I mean, look at all of the contraptions they used for early semiauto rifles, before the Garand was refined, then compare that to the guts of a FAL.
Granted, the later designs are based on experience gained on the earlier ones, and I'll bet that counts for a LOT.