That makes me curious (I know nothing about these rifles).they no handle gas better due to a design change.
Apparently a rogue "no" got in that sentence (since fixed)...so I can understand the confusion. The original M-70 didn't handle gas that well (not important unless you vent gas via split brass, et al), but per my understanding since the "Classic" series the M-70 has an improved design that handles the gas a bit better by using a "gas block" (not sure if this is the correct term) on the bolt. This block prevents gases from following the raceway and being directed into the shooters face. Rather it is directed into the magazine where it is allowed to dissipate generally causing no harm to the shooter or equipment. It is very nice feature for the handloader that wants to squeeze every bit of life they can out of their brass. The venerable Mauser G-98 platform employs a similar design and vents gas efficiently as well.ants said:Hello, Maverick223.
That makes me curious (I know nothing about these rifles).Me said:they [strike]no[/strike] handle gas better due to a design change.
Help me learn something new. Explain what you mean?
Same here, for use (rather than collecting...looking at) the new models are just as good and in a few ways actually superior. Furthermore there is no reason to purchase a rifle that costs twice as much, unless you just have to have it.Personally, I would not bother paying for a Pre-64.