First let me say thank you to CB and A1 for all their helpful posts on this forum regarding safes (RSC). I have been researching safes in detail and this forum is a great source of information.
While each company is entitled to warranty as they wish and consumers can do as they wish, it still makes no sense to me, as a consumer, that the company that builds the better safe and charges for it would have a warranty that is 20% as long, 1 year verses 5 years.
While I agree that it is unlikely that anything will go wrong, I have the luck of Murphy.
If it is just good marketing, and the AMSEC safe is all but fool proof, then why wouldn't AMSEC provide a better warranty? They get all benefit of the marketing, plus, because their safe is so good, none of the cost of repairs.
It's not that I won't buy the AMSEC, but for the extra $1500, I feel like I ought to at least get the same warranty as the cheapo Liberty. Or 50% of the warranty time?
I think we will all agree that if something is to go wrong, it will most likely be with the lock. CB and A1 know infinetly more than I do, but based on my research, the electonic locks do go bad. They are electronics with a small motor or selenoid and unfortunatly stuff breaks. They are however, made by third party companies such as S&G and LeGard, so the company who makes the safe might not matter as much, unless one safe would 'stress' or bind the lock.
I wonder if the locks come with a seperate warranty?