Watchful Eyes Reveal Concealed Weapons

Status
Not open for further replies.

RKCheung

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
365
Location
PRK
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/FutureTech/fusedimages030708.html

Revealing Pair of Eyes
New Software Blends Images to Spot Hidden Weapons

By Paul Eng



July 8 — When it comes to patrolling the mean streets of post-Saddam Iraq, American soldiers could benefit from an extra set of eyes.



Since major combat ended in April, more than 40 American soldiers have been killed by Iraqi insurgents armed with hidden weapons and explosives. In many cases, such as Sunday's attack when a soldier was killed while waiting to buy a drink, the assailants often strike from among crowds of people.

But keeping soldiers and others safe from assassins hidden in a crowd may eventually become a bit easier.

Rick Blum, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pa., has been working with a team of scientists that could give soldiers and police a set of X-ray eyes.

The setup uses two cameras. One camera takes normal digital images while a separate camera uses a new chip called a millimeter-wave (MMW) sensor.

The new sensor, based on MMW radar developed by the military, emits very high frequency radio waves that can penetrate clothing and walls to reveal metal objects such as guns and knives. The resulting image looks much like an X-ray photograph.

While other researchers and companies are working to develop similar — and controversial — concealed weapons detectors, Blum's system goes a bit further that just revealing what's under a person's clothes.


The Best of Both Views

At the heart of the experimental system is a unique set of computer algorithms or programming code, that analyzes the images from both the MMW sensor and digital camera. The software is optimized to compare matching regions of each digital image and use only the best features and details of each.

The idea, says Blum, is that both visual and MMW images have their own unique strengths and weaknesses.

"You need to look at each image and say, 'What am I trying to get out of it?' " says Blum. "The visual image is better than the MMW image at helping to identify exactly who they're looking at. But the MMW image is good at revealing what's hidden but at the expense of [other] visual details."

Since the software is designed to show only details that is found in one image but lacking in the other, the results are stunning. An operator sees not only a normal visual of what the video camera sees but also any objects that are hidden from plain view. That makes it much easier to identify a suspicious person in a crowd and direct soldiers and police to pay attention to that particular person.

Black Eyes

Before the system can become fully operational, Blum admits that key issues still need to be worked out. Key among them: the MMW sensors.

With only two or three such sophisticated sensors built so far, "the MMW is far too expensive," says Blum. "Right now, it's just not practical."

As such, Blum is modifying his software to work with other types of sensors including infrared, and so-called backscatter radar that is currently being considered for use in airport screening systems.

And like those other screening systems, there remains the question if such weapons detectors could be used in the United States without violating laws against unreasonable search and seizure.

"The use of anything that is invasive for general purposes — capturing everyone that comes in the scope of the technology — really does raise the most serious questions," says David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington,. D.C.


On the Move

Blum believes that the system could still find eventual use among the U.S. military — especially among forces deployed in peace-keeping roles in other nations. By equipping troops with such technology, soldiers would be able to spot potential enemies without resorting to physical body searches and potentially alienating peaceful bystanders.

"It would be great to be able to give this technology to police and to military troops in Iraq," said Blum in a press release from Lehigh University.

In the meantime, Blum is seeking additional funding from the Department of Defense for further research and development. He hopes that a portable prototype can be developed for field trials soon.
 
After 911 and after the federales began implementing "security" provisions at airports, I saw an interview with the former head of El Al security.

His comment was profound. He was asked as to the effectiveness of the American "security" provisions being introduced.

He said what the US is doing most likely will not work in the long run. He said the US is more interested in capturing weapons than terrorists.

This article shows the guy was prophetic at a minimum.
 
I wonder if these soldiers will develop an eye for spotting weapons that will carry over to when they get back to the states. I'm guessing they were oblivious to concealed weapons like most people here. May not be so oblivious when they get back.
 
This may get me flamed, but...

Insurgents? Assassins? No way. They're taking out members of an invading/occupying military force. That's war.

Ironic how if it's the bad guys doing the occupying, insurgents and assassins become "freedom fighters", "the resistance", etc.
 
You want to call people shooting at US soldiers "freedom fighters"?

They are defending their homeland from invaders. Simple as that. If some foreign country decided to invade the U.S. because we have WMD's and we have used them in the past (same kinda justification)....

Just for the argument figure the invading country has a similar disparity of power as the U.S. and Iraq do....reversed of course.

What would you do??
 
Gotta agree here.....

Not that I care for that bunch over there, but they are soldiers fighting soldiers.

Like the attack on the USS Cole: that was a military target.

Or the British, who couldn't understand when a bunch of farmers hid behind rocks and trees and took out officers. The tactics were different and they didn't understand.

We had better rethink our ideas about warfare.
 
A camera that sees through clothing in a Muslim country? Oh, that should go over very well with the fundamentalists. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top