And we have alot of them with pictures @ www.downsouthhunting.com
inside the gun room
inside the gun room
Why not just say, "We have guns"?
If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.
It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?
In fact the message would be most effective and efficient if it had no words at all. It is one of those communications in which the essential quality is its very intangibility, which is destroyed as soon as it is posted.
Why not just say, "We have guns"?
If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.
It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?
Why not just say, "We have guns"?
If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.
It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?
All true. But isn't it equally true that he would not have posted unless he did have guns? So the word "have" is redundant, and the message could have been more efficiently phrased as "We guns."
But who else could he mean? So there's no need for the "We" either. All he had to say was "Guns."
Anyone who takes the proper perspective, though, and shrugs off all vestiges of a false consciousness, should immediately see that a message posted in a section entitled "General Gun Discussions" would be about guns. That word should be dropped too.
In fact the message would be most effective and efficient if it had no words at all. It is one of those communications in which the essential quality is its very intangibility, which is destroyed as soon as it is posted.