Where is the raw truth? Where is it that outlines that the foundation of our rights to keep and bear arms is to "kill people?"
Every gun that I own will kill someone. I didn't buy any of to kill anyone, even the guns that I have for defense, I bought them because they have the capability to do so.
To the first part, about 'where the outline' might be...this is precisely the point I was trying to make. Our rights are not outlined by the Constitution. Our rights are many and innumerable. When you say 'Second Amendment Rights' it is a mis-statement. Of course, you may actually believe in what I said, but if you continue to say it in such a way, as does the media, as do the public schools, as do the lawmakers, as do the average Joe and Sally citizen, the statement takes on a life of it's own. The statement, factually in error, because truth in the eyes of many.
It's the old sentiment about repeating a lie long enough, and eventually people will believe it. The problem is, this type of lie is really subtle, and people don't question it.
To the second part of your response, you bought your guns so you could kill people. To me, it's the same as saying something like:
Q: Why did you learn Karate?
A: So I can kick people in the head.
If you extrapolate this idea, you could probably get out of the kick-meister that he learned to kick people in the head for self defense purposes.
How do you feel about those tactical courses, and sniper (or 'tactical precision' or whatever) courses that are offered to civilians?
What are those courses for? They're definitely for killing people, and not in a 'self-defense' kind of way. I'm sure someone can come up with some long-winded reason as to why these are in fact self-defense courses, but let's be honest here: Those courses are for learning how to kill people.
Should we not have those courses? Should people not be allowed to learn these tactics? Obviously anyone that attends one of these courses is going to climb a clock tower and start putting lead threw people.