FireInCairo
member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2009
- Messages
- 710
It appears the M&P's can be had cheaper than your average Glock, too. So there's a second point of improvement.
Well, OK, I'll tell you why I chose an M&P over a Glock.The point of this thread is to ask is how the customer benefits from another polymer Glock clone. What better do we get? Anything?!
Sounds like a lousy deal. The P99 did a lot, it got to the ergonomics point first, then it added a cocked indicator, ambi mag release.
I was hoping to uncover some sort of major changes like that, but I guess there are really none then?
that gun made the improvement you speak of long before the M & P came out
If this is a serious post and you were after "some major changes" then you honestly do not know much about firearms. They are rarely major changes made over a short period of time. Glock offered no major changes after HK. Designs build off of each other.
By your theory Glock and the P99 had no reason being built either
Please educate yourself.
The P99 did a lot, it got to the ergonomics point first, then it added a cocked indicator, ambi mag release.
The double/single action trigger was one of the things I forgot. That is definitely a major change. How many striker polymers do that? Now you can shut up and get back to the topic of explaining what the S & W does better, if anything.
Now you can get back to the topic of explaining what the S & W does better, if anything.
verdun59 said:Wow, i just stepped out for some more popcorn, keep it going guys. By the way when you settle this , how about a rousing debate on 9mm vs .45acp.