"Tactical, target, and hunting" -- You might fudge on two out of three, but you'd be stretching.
Leupold, but what you'd use for tactical and/or target won't be functional for hunting. It will be too large, too heavy and won't provide a sufficient field of view. You opt for "hunting" and you won't have the magnification for target. You don't want scope knobs on a hunting scope -- bang, crunch.
As for "range finder" -- The pros use a mil dot reticle.
Just for the record, I set up a Rem. 700 SPS in .308. Jewell trigger and a Leupold Mark 4, 50mm in 6 - 22x. Mil dot. Long lens hood, bipod. Works for "target" and "sniper" -- I like shooting stuff at 600 yds. No field of view for "hunting" (3 - 9x works), and it's a bit on the heavy side for "tactical" (unless you're a sniper).
For "tactical/hunting" I opted for a Win. Mod 70, "stainless Classic" (post 1992) in 30-06 Spfd. w/ Leupold VX II 3 - 9x 40mm, duplex reticle. Put a sling on it, and I can carry it in the field. It's good out to 600 yds. Beyond that, I want more magnification in a scope, bigger glass -- also a heavier gun, heavy barrel, target trigger, which gets into a "bench gun" more like the Rem. above.
I'm not sure what you mean by "tactical." It gets over-used. My idea of "tactical" is a semi-auto, high capacity, and more like a carbine. -- Unless you're working at distance, and then a scoped bolt gun like the Win. above, but not a heavy "sniper" rig w/ a huge scope like the Rem. SPS.
But hell . . . I've seen scoped SKS and AK out hunting. Locally, the lever carbines are considered "tactical" and the truck is a "redneck Hummer."
