When do you consider a new magazine "proven"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

lions

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,204
Location
Kansas
Imagine the gun of your choice which you have previously proven to be reliable with whatever procedure you subscribe to. You buy a new magazine for said gun and are looking to incorporate it into an EDC/HD role. When would you consider that magazine acceptably reliable for serious use?

A certain number of rounds fired?
A certain number of full magazines emptied regardless of capacity?
Something else entirely?

Interested to hear the opinions of THR. Thanks
 
i normally shoot 500rds minimum in a gun before i think it is reliable enough to carry more often than that it is 1k or more of fmj, and then the SD ammo that i am going to be carrying. I use the magazines that i am going to carry during this initial phase of testing to get as much use with the 2-3 magazines as possible. once the gun has proven itself and the mags too, i carry the gun with those magazines, and use training magazines for the range.
 
If the gun is already proven, I take the new mags to the range and shoot enough practice ammo to get the gun good and dirty, say 150-200 rounds, then run 3 or 4 magazines of defense ammo through them, with at least a couple mags fired from support hand only. (I only ever seem to have feeding problems show up when firing from my support hand)

After that, I consider them good. I make a habit of firing all the ammo out of my defense mags and replacing it about once per month to 6 weeks, mostly as a mag function check.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top