Who reads the Constitution?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nice to see most people here have actually read it, but sadly:

Study shows more Americans know 'The Simpsons' than First Amendment rights

Thursday, March 2, 2006

CHICAGO - The Associated Press


Americans apparently know more about "The Simpsons" TV show than about the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Only one in four Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment (freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition for redress of grievances.) But more than half can name at least two members of the TV cartoon family, according to a survey.

The study by the new McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum found that 22 percent of Americans could name all five Simpson family members, compared with just one in 1,000 people who could name all five First Amendment freedoms.

Joe Madeira, director of exhibitions at the museum, said he was surprised by the results. :what:

"Part of the survey really shows there are misconceptions, and part of our mission is to clear up these misconceptions," said Madeira, whose museum will be dedicated to helping visitors understand the First Amendment when it opens in April. "It means we have our job cut out for us."

The survey found more people could name the three "American Idol" judges -- Simon Cowell, Paula Abdul and Randy Jackson -- than identify three First Amendment rights. They were also more likely to remember popular advertising slogans.

It also showed that people misidentified First Amendment rights. About one in five people thought the right to own a pet was protected, and 38 percent said they believed the right against self-incrimination contained in the Fifth Amendment was a First Amendment right, the survey found.

The telephone survey of 1,000 random adults was conducted Jan. 20-22 by the research firm Synovate and had an error margin of three percentage points.

Apparently, this study was so amusing overseas that it was carried in
Turkey:

http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=37090
 
I have a small pocket sized book that has the the Declaration and Constitution is it. I keep it in my agenda and it's almost always with me. Comes in handy during political science courses when rabid socialists like to misquote the Bill of Rights.
 
Wanna talk about Constitutional over reach by the federal government and good ol' George W -

just look at the No Child Left Behind Act.

The federal governments involvement in public education is unconstitutional.

The Tenth Amendment...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

No where in the Constitution is the federal government given the authority over public education.

Ergo - any rules regarding No Child Left Behind are unconstitutional and and over reaching of power.

But tell that to our school districts that would be almost bankrupt without federal interference.

Man I'd love to teach high school social studies.

Robert
 
RobXD9 said:
The Tenth Amendment...
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The tenth amendment....''WE DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' TENTH AMENDMENT!!!"
Seriously, that amendment was TKO'd decades ago. Don't blamed Bush. He was an infant when it happened. He's just following the compass rose set forth by 70 years of politics since FDR..........:cuss: :banghead: :fire: or:neener: , depending on how you feel at any particular time......
 
I have and will see to it that my niece and nephews do as well.

It should be a mandatory part of our education system.
 
Last edited:
The Constitution gives the people more rights than the government presently allows. It was written for the people, but the government is killing it.
 
My dad sent me the replica documents since he lives in DC,got it from one of gift shops in the museum section.They are in frames on my wall.

I have copies printed from the newspaper on the walls at work of the Bill of Rights and pledge of allegiance for customers to read while they wait.

Yes I have read the Declaration of Independence and Constitution along with what was taken out of them.I have skimmed the Federalist papers,still need to read it all.

Funny that my anger at Clinton made me get more political and look into American history deeper.Funny that as I got more involved in learning American history it made me read the Holy Bible more often.
 
Seriously, that amendment was TKO'd decades ago. Don't blamed Bush. He was an infant when it happened.

Oh I absolutely agree. It's not Bush. It's ever president for decades.

...and now we see what happens when we sit down and allow the federal government to do as they wish.

The 10th was already death of a thousand cuts.

What's to come of the 2nd?

Robert
 
though I read about the fact that certain politicians are recommending granting amnesty to a certain amount of illegal immigrants I have not learned the details of their proposal.

I believe if they do this,one requirment should be that they have english classes and American history classes.It would bring more people to think of themselves as a individual and understand the concept of individual freedoms and responsibility.While I do not think it would sway all,it seems to me that it would deprogram some who are use to a centralized government.

or maybe Im kidding myself.
 
RobXD9, You forgot one thing, it was passed by the Congress and Senate and signed into law by the President and unless the Supreme Court Rules it as unconstitutional it will stand as law, like it or not. In order for it to be change now it would have to go back to the House and Senate to change the law they passed. Or as I mentioned it could be thrown out as an Unconstitutional law but I don't think that is going to happen.
 
I Do

I read the Constitution, Federalist Papers, and Declaration of Independence. They are all combined into a nifty pocket-sized book which on the desk right now. :D How many can say you have read these, plus your State Constitutions and Codes. ? I can. They are references I keep on retainer. ;)
 
I am actually surprised that nobody mentioned the model that our Bill Of Rights was fashioned after.

http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/virginia_declaration_of_rights.html

The Virginia Declaration of Rights
Virginia's Declaration of Rights was drawn upon by Thomas Jefferson for the opening paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. It was widely copied by the other colonies and became the basis of the Bill of Rights. Written by George Mason, it was adopted by the Virginia Constitutional Convention on June 12, 1776.

A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government .

Section 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

Section 2. That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants and at all times amenable to them.

Section 3. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration. And that, when any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community has an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.

Section 4. That no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which, nor being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge to be hereditary.

Section 5. That the legislative and executive powers of the state should be separate and distinct from the judiciary; and that the members of the two first may be restrained from oppression, by feeling and participating the burdens of the people, they should, at fixed periods, be reduced to a private station, return into that body from which they were originally taken, and the vacancies be supplied by frequent, certain, and regular elections, in which all, or any part, of the former members, to be again eligible, or ineligible, as the laws shall direct.

Section 6. That elections of members to serve as representatives of the people, in assembly ought to be free; and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community, have the right of suffrage and cannot be taxed or deprived of their property for public uses without their own consent or that of their representatives so elected, nor bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assembled for the public good.

Section 7. That all power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by any authority, without consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights and ought not to be exercised.

Section 8. That in all capital or criminal prosecutions a man has a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation, to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of twelve men of his vicinage, without whose unanimous consent he cannot be found guilty; nor can he be compelled to give evidence against himself; that no man be deprived of his liberty except by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers.

Section 9. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Section 10. That general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive and ought not to be granted.

Section 11. That in controversies respecting property, and in suits between man and man, the ancient trial by jury is preferable to any other and ought to be held sacred.

Section 12. That the freedom of the press is one of the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by despotic governments.

Section 13. That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

Section 14. That the people have a right to uniform government; and, therefore, that no government separate from or independent of the government of Virginia ought to be erected or established within the limits thereof.

Section 15. That no free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.

Section 16. That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practise Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other.

Section 13 is the model for the Second Amendment. According to the state of Virgina's Dec of Rights, Militaries during times of peace are a bad idea!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top