Ya'know, you could always
close off whatever ports you decided to put in to make a "bolt on suppressor/compensator."
The lack of a perfect seal would let a good deal of noise out, but I'll bet it would still be quieter than a plain barrel (let alone a comp), and counter much of the recoil. Heck, that gap might (
might) even exempt this product from NFA restrictions.
For those postulating the slight gap present during the pressure spike would allow all the gas to escape out the sides before it could comp, go check out a .500 S&W revolver barrel.
While some gas does escape through the gap, the lion's share goes forward without a loss of velocity. One way to picture it: except for the low-speed (boundary layer) gas up against the chamber walls, the rest is moving too fast (bullet speed) to make the turn out the cylinder gap. That said, I think this comp setup would be most effective on chamberings with lots of slower powder. Think Wildey Magnum cartridges
At any rate, just set the design up with an adjustable gap, either with a threaded insert opposite the muzzle, or a sliding mount on the weaver rail. For whatever gun in use, just position the comp to where the gap is in the range seen in revolvers, and torque down. You could even make it have adjustable weight/length by stacking multiple compensator blocks together. Much more flexible than a fixed comp milled in a barrel or screw-on suppressor.
BTW, this setup has the very desirable ablilty to be mounted on any gun with a lower rail, and without any other modifications. Not all guns have threaded barrels available. The reciprocating mass also stays the same with an off-barrel setup, so recoil springs may not need changing, rate of fire would stay the same, and reliability would be less affected.
TCB