Are you saying we should infringe on their first amendment rights to pray in school?
It always amazes me that folks who can debate and understand minutiae of NICs cannot distinguish between Constitutionally protected prayer and using tax payer funded facilities to compel others to pray. Certainly the Mormons and Catholics who sued in the Santa Fe case were not in any way trying to block anyone's right to pray! They simply wanted their children not to be coerced into prayer at a taxpayer funded school event in a taxpayer funded stadium using taxpayer funded resources.
What part of "no law respecting" do you not understand? You cannot collect taxes and use those taxes to compel people to pray.
As long as those who argue steadfastly for the 2nd Amendment are so willing to casually dismiss other amendments, why would a "neo-liberal" - or any thinking person - believe that support of the 2nd implies support of any of the other?
Mike