beatledog7
Member
Kleanbore:
There's no reliable rimfire ammo out there? A couple of 40gr bullets through the brain won't stop an attacker, but a couple of 115gr bullets will?
As I read it, you're saying that a person who knows the pluses and minuses of various rounds and can put several rounds from his or her .25 or .22 caliber gun into an attacker's eye sockets every time, who given all that knowledge and pin-point proficiency sticks with that .25ACP or .22LR as his or her SD carry firearm, is a boob.
I have stated that such a person will probably not make such a choice. I would not. But if the person I've described did choose such a theoretically ineffective round, on what basis would you challenge that choice? When that person downs an attacker with a clean CNS shot, was the caliber choice still wrong?
There's no reliable rimfire ammo out there? A couple of 40gr bullets through the brain won't stop an attacker, but a couple of 115gr bullets will?
As I read it, you're saying that a person who knows the pluses and minuses of various rounds and can put several rounds from his or her .25 or .22 caliber gun into an attacker's eye sockets every time, who given all that knowledge and pin-point proficiency sticks with that .25ACP or .22LR as his or her SD carry firearm, is a boob.
I have stated that such a person will probably not make such a choice. I would not. But if the person I've described did choose such a theoretically ineffective round, on what basis would you challenge that choice? When that person downs an attacker with a clean CNS shot, was the caliber choice still wrong?