Because the market is already saturated.
Why tool up for a gun for which you may never get a piece of the market?
They're good at making the things they do, maybe the see no need to expand and take risks.
I suspect the guys at Ruger have looked at the cost of tooling up for the 1911 compared to how many units they would sell and what it would cost to produce them and decided it wouldn't be cost effective.
Check out the frames in the lower picture. Looks like Ruger is tooled for the 1911 frame, and probably for the slide as well. There is also what looks like a 1911 safety in the upper picture.
If Ruger can build a basic 1911 at the same price as a cast frame/slide 1911 such as the RIA, around 400-500, and a model to compete pricewise with the STI Spartan (this has cast frame and slide), they will sell a lot.
Ruger would have to carefully plan the 1911 route they took. They generally only build items that sell like crazy. To do this you have to walk a fine line between price point and quality. One they have walked well.
I envision them wanting to put out a product with all the features of the Taurus 1911 at a similar or slightly higher price. This is not easy for an American company to do anymore.
If I remember correctly, Ruger was in business with the same investment casting firm that produces the Caspian frames. There might be some agreement to refrain from crossing over business ventures over the production of 1911's because of those business agreements.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.