Hey I figured out how to quote.I am pretty interested in the 277, but it appears almost all of your barrels are out of stock. When do you plan on doing another run? Also, for general non suppressed shooting what length do you recommend?
I understand and that's ok. The pains of still being a Wildcat and not yet supported by some huge company.I considered the cartridge for my ultralight build and probably spoke to you a couple times.
In the end I decided on 300blk for availability reasons. But if you pull an RSilvers with 277 like he did 300bo and I'm there.
IMO there's a lot of room for new cartridges based on a 5.56 case
Well, yes, but it isn't up to us. We don't have a seat at the SAAMI table. We have talked to some large companies that do, and there has been interest in putting it through, but it will take one of them "sponsoring" it which hasn't happened yet. It's only a matter of time before they realize the sales opportunities they are missing out on and that will push it over the finish line.Are you guys working on standardizing with SAAMI?
The 6.8 will give you extended range. We surveyed 1,000 shooters that are hunters and asked what they consider their average range when they take deer and what is the max range they would as well (with an AR). Most said their average range was 150 yards and max was 300. That being said, folks are taking deer with the WLV out past 300 all day. So, if you figure the WLV covers your average and max ranges, and is just a simple "barrel swap" in an AR15 (meaning it takes ALL 5.56 components except the barrel), the WLV makes a lot of sense to a lot of folks.I shoot a .270 win and really like the idea of component interchangeability. To that point, I already have a 6.8spc2 barrel sitting in the safe waiting to be built into an upper. When I do that though I have some expense coming in repro filing th heavy monstrosity that it currently is, then 6.8 bolt carrier group, mags, dies, ammo, etc. I understand the beauty of using common brass as parent cases as well.
So what would benefit me in simply building a 277 rather than moving forward with the 6.8, assuming I sell the 6.8 barrel. Is there enough justification to change my plans?
I have no direct knowledge of this cartridge but if they're stuffing 205gr bullets in there, I'd have to assume 120gr SST's will fit just fine.can the 120 grain hornady SST be able to be seated into the .277 case and still fit AR mags?
it all depends on the ogive radius and nose shape of the bullet, not the length or weightI have no direct knowledge of this cartridge but if they're stuffing 205gr bullets in there, I'd have to assume 120gr SST's will fit just fine.
I agree. But that's an 85gr difference. They're probably stuffing quite a bit of extra bullet shank into the brass to get them to fit into an AR mag. You'd probably have to do the same with the SST's. But the casing is already about 0.20" shorter than .223/5.56 so that would probably give the SST more room out front.it all depends on the ogive radius and nose shape of the bullet, not the length or weight