None of those, but I do own a PTR-91 that is quite reliable. Not really the same "theme" though.Cooldill:
As for reliability, do you also have either a Saiga rifle or other AK derivative, or possibly a Vz-58?
Such a rifle can make a perfect complement for a Makarov. The problem is that people begin acquiring more of the same type or category.
Yes, I had two and four Glocks. The Makarovs were more reliable.Okay guys, 750 rounds and counting.
0 failures.
Thanks, why should I go with the heavier spring? I think I will keep the same grips because they are more concealable, look very cool, and are comfortable. I fired 750 rounds in 3 consecutive days with no ill effects to my hand.Maks are famous for their reliability.
There is no spring on the firing pin, it's called a "floating" design. The rule is if you shake the gun and it doesn't rattle then it needs to be cleaned.
You should replace the weak 17 lb. factory spring with a 19 lb. one from Wolfe.
A rubber grip from Pearce will make it more comfortable. but also much wider and less suitable for CCW.
Hornady makes a JHP round for the Mak.
For everything you will ever need to know about the Mak, go to www.gunboards.com/Makarov. Be advised that it is NOT THR and some of the people there can be real jerks.
Thanks Tubeshooter!Congratulations on a fine pistol.
Please excuse the board if they are not particularly surprised at another 5000+ trouble-free rounds fired.
If you don't mind all-steel and rather heavy, the Makarov is a solid addition to a collection. I have your gun's commercial cousin in .380. I agree that the military grips are trimmer and easier to deal with; I may get some one of these days...
Ah, makes sense. I plan to pretty much only shoot the and carry the cheap 92-95 grain steel cased ball loads, which have worked nicely so far.IIRC the standard round for the Mak is 95 grns. I was told if you're going to use a heavier round, like the Bears, you should replace the spring so you don't beat on the frame.