NWcityguy2
Member
I really have nothing to prove, especially to you. That photo was attached to information about .40 Glock wear I found. If you have information to prove it is a 9mm frame, please post that. If you have information that it is from a failure, post that information.
You asked a question and I attempted to answer it. In return you've been rude and utterly in character with the kind of people I constantly run into when something so emotional as a caliber is on the line.
Look at the image I posted, everything is there for you to find it yourself on the web. If you choose to feel offended, that's your choice. The conversation was supposed to be about if 40s do or don't wear out faster. Not throwing around the "now I know you're the one who is emotional" accusation. You haven't even gone as far to answer how competitive shooters aren't wearing out their 40s. I've been shooting for several years and have never seen it. Instead, you grabbed some random picture off the WWW which wouldn't have even made your point if it was from a Glock chambered in 40, which it wasn't.
So, answer me this; why don't competitive shooters, many who use Glock 22s and 35s, don't run into the problem of frame battering?