Sharpie443 wrote:
Responding to anti gun questions
First, can I have the wasted 29 minutes of my life back?
Second, before you do something like this that is going to be on the 'net forever, write a script, consider how the anti-gun movement may interpret your answers from their perspective - particularly your various concessions to their arguments - and then revise the script accordingly to make sure it says what you intend before recording it.
Third, if what you know is antique firearms, what qualifications do you have to respond on behalf of those of us who use modern firearms and find ourselves under assault because of the recent mass shooting in Las Vegas? You do not speak for me and should not prate about as if you do so.
Forth, before you take it upon yourself to speak for the
all pro-2A supporters, take a moment to check with us and see what concessions we're willing to make the the anti-gun movement before you start making them for us.
Fifth, if you want to mount a defense of gun ownership, do so. If you want to open a dialogue with the anti-gun movement, do so. But, you can't say, "We're right" and the same time you say, "Let's talk about it."
If it were possible, I would ask you to remove this video from YouTube, but it's already on the archive sites forever so that every anti-gun activist can point to it and the concessions you make.