FredWyn
member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2019
- Messages
- 25
That’s because the original contract went to FN and was modified to include Colt thanks to the latter’s longtime military relationship. They were previously undercut by Remington and the current bid per unit is nearly half what Colt originally was charging. That figure, by the way, is under $700 which is likely the same or less profitable than civilian sales profit.
Do you have facts you can document to prove what you posted? If so, please share.