Henry Rifles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Big Boy X in .44 Magnum.

Shoots magnums great, feeds SWC great. Doesnt at all enjoy feeding/extracting .44 specials tho. I've only put 2 different special brands/loads thru it and one definitely works a bit better than the other but wouldn't trust ethier to be consistent. Single loaded directly in the chamber and they shoot faaaaantastic tho.

Would to add one if their side gate all weathers in .357 in my collection.
 
I picked up my first Henry a couple of months ago to keep my Marlins company.

I had started looking for the Marlin Dark Series 45-70 because of the threaded barrel, but they are going for super crazy $$$ right now.

Then I discovered that Henry released the H010X.
Them adding the Side Gate sealed the deal for me.
I like pepperoni and mushrooms on my pizza and I like Side Gates on my Lever Actions.
To each their own! LOL

That said... I have been very happy with the Henry so far.

Screwing a 'can on the end will put a smile on your face.
 
I’m surprised to hear that Henry took the .327 steel out of their inventory. I just looked on Henry’s website and they have the brasslight version still available. Of the two, I would’ve thought the brass light one would’ve been removed because of the extra weight compared to the steel model.

I REALLY would love to hear from someone at Corp Henry if that is a long term decision and why it was made. I can’t believe it’s due to lack of sales as Henry is the only game in town right now for lever .327 FMs.
Last week I sent Henry an email, asking why the steel .327's were no longer on their website. I received a somewhat cryptic answer today:

Thank you for contacting Henry. Sir they are not discontinued but are not coming out with a side gate for that model yet.

This leads me to believe that we will see the steel .327 with a loading gate in the future. Hopefully, since I want one.
 
Last week I sent Henry an email, asking why the steel .327's were no longer on their website. I received a somewhat cryptic answer today:

Thank you for contacting Henry. Sir they are not discontinued but are not coming out with a side gate for that model yet.

This leads me to believe that we will see the steel .327 with a loading gate in the future. Hopefully, since I want one.
I hope this is true of the 41 magnum big boy steel as well.
 
I own two Henry rifles,,,
But they are not the normal Henry rifles one would expect.

Henry Acu-Bolt, .22 LR bolt action single-shot (adult size)
Henry Mini-Bolt, .22 LR bolt action single-shot (youth size)

170207-AccuBoltAndMiniBolt.jpg

As plain Jane a pair of rifles as one could ever find,,,
But both are excellent shooters.

My Acu-Bolt came with a cheap 4X scope,,,
The Mini-Bolt used to come with the same scope.

But by the time I got around to buying the Mini-Bolt,,,
They had eliminated the scope entirely.

I took the scope off the Acu-Bolt and mounted it on the Mini-Bolt,,,
Then I mounted a Simmons 3-9 x 32 on the Acu-Bolt.

Like I said,,,
Not what one expects when you ask about Henry Rifles.

Aarond

.
 
As usual Drifty, nice pics. Yeah, I understand the reason for chambering the repro Henry's in .45 Colt and .44-40, but these aren't exactly rifles that I feel people are relying solely on factory ammo to shoot, so why they didn't bother with shorter rimmed cases like .45 Schofield or .44 Russian as those would have kept the carrier as short as possible. Like, maybe they'd get more sales, but at least make it an option that people could own something even closer to the originals.

It's an issue that's rampant with the lever action manufacturers in that they are not even trying to support the market in providing lever action rifles that can feed and cycle shorter cartridges.

Which leads me to a question for you Drift. How popular do you think lever action rifles would be in CAS if they held an extra 4 to 7 rounds in the tube magazine? Or is there some rule in CAS that lever action rifles can only hold a certain amount of ammunition?

Howdy Again

I can only speculate that Uberti and HRAC chose to limit chambering their reproductions of the 1860 Henry to 45 Colt and 44-40 because of the relative ease of finding those cartridges in local gun stores. Yes, there are shooters who do not reload, and they have to rely on what they can find on store shelves. Yes, 45 Colt is a lot easier to find than 44-40, but I can only assume that was the reasoning. I think a long time ago Uberti made some that were chambered for 44 Special, but those have not been available for a long time.

Over the years there have been calls to chamber the Henry for the much more easily available 38 Special, but that would result in a really heavy gun. My 44-40 Henry with its 24" barrel weighs 9 pounds 15 ounces unloaded. It weighs a full pound more than a Model 1873 Winchester with a 24" barrel. If chambered for 38 Special, with a smaller hole down the barrel, it would weigh even more. That is why the Henry has never been chambered for 38 Special.

Yes, there is some interest in CAS in shooting shorter cartridges in the Henry. In addition to 45 Schofield and 44 Russian, there is the 45 Cowboy Special, which has the same case head configuration as the 45 Colt, but is the same length and has the same interior capacity as 45 ACP.

Here is a photo of five 45 caliber cartridges. Left to right they are 45 Colt, 45 Schofield, 45 Cowboy Special (45CS), 45 Auto Rim, and 45 ACP. The 45CS was developed because so many shooters try to download the 45 Colt with ridiculously light powder charges. Light powder charges that do not do well in a cartridge with an much interior capacity as the 45 Colt. So by coming up with a rimmed cartridge the same length and interior capacity as 45 ACP, but with the same rim configuration as 45 Colt, shooters could load it extra light and not worry about the problems of loading the cavernous 45 Colt case with light loads. Because of its rim configuration, the 45CS can be chambered and fired in any single action revolver chambered for 45 Colt. In addition, when loaded with Black Powder they can load it with far less powder than 45 Colt or 45 Schofield, to save powder and cut down on recoil. (Wimps). When loading Smokeless, the same recipes can be used for 45CS as are used in 45ACP or 45AR.

pmNglbXFj.jpg




Anyway, one of our cowboy gunsmiths came up with a special carrier specifically adapted for the 45CS round a number of years ago. It is a standard carrier modified with a spring loaded stop that allows the shorter rounds to be used. He says it can also be used for 44 Russian, if anybody could find a Henry chambered for 44 Special. He also states he has another version that can be used in the 1866 and 1873 models.

https://www.thesmithshop.com/cbs45.html



Frankly, I have always been very happy with my 44-40 Henry, as well as my 38-40 and 44-40 Winchesters. I have never had any desire to stuff in more shorter cartridges. But there are those who feel a little bit closer to history with a shorter cartridge.



How popular would a lever gun be that held more rounds? First off, you would have to convince the manufacturers it would be worth their while. Nobody has done that yet. Frankly, you don't see a whole lot of Henry rifles at a CAS match in the first place, maybe one of two at most. The most popular rifle is still an Uberti replica of the 1873 Winchester. I do not think there would be a whole lot of interest in a Henry chambered for a shorter round such as 45 Schofield or 45 CS. And I doubt if there would be any interest at all in one chambered for 44 Russian. I load 44 Russian with Black Powder for my antique S&W Top Breaks, but I do not know anybody else who loads 44 Russian.

No, there is no limit as to how many rounds a CAS Main Match rifle can hold. Those of us with rifles with 24" barrels can usually stuff 13 44-40s or 45 Colts into one.

However there is a stage convention in CAS that rifles are almost always loaded with only 10 rounds. Years ago we used to have stages where we could load 12 or more, but that put those guys with short rifles or carbines at a disadvantage, so even though there is no hard fast rule, by convention most stages call for 10 rounds in the rifle. Which causes a problem for some guys. We used to have a shooter who had a trapper model of the 1894 Winchester chambered for 45 Colt and he could only stuff 9 rounds in the magazine. He always had to load one round on the clock, which slowed him down. He passed away a few years ago.




Then there is the Henry Hop. There is a finger tab on the bottom of the follower of a Henry rifle. There is an open slot running the full length of bottom of the magazine. The tab extends through the slot. Because there is no loading gate on a Henry, in order to load it you grab the tab and pull it all the way forward, compressing the spring. Then you swivel the false muzzle out of the way to feed cartridges into the front of the magazine.

This photo shows the false muzzle swiveled out of the way. The brass tab is the tab on the bottom of the follower. The magazine spring is inside the false muzzle and is completely compressed.

pm0ZS3cHj.jpg




After loading one GENTLY lowers the follower onto the stack of cartridges. Yes, there have been accidental discharges of cartridges in the magazine resulting from the follower being allowed to slam down with its full spring force on a column of cartridges in the magazine. Yes, it can and has happened. It is also not recommended to hold the rifle vertically when loading and drop rounds down the magazine. I always hold mine at a slight angle on the loading table and allow the rounds to slowly trickle down the tube. Don't ask me how this can happen with center fire ammunition with flat point bullets, I can only tell you that it has happened more than once. I have even heard of one club that has banned Henry rifles because of this.

Anyway, when firing a Henry, every time the carrier strips a round out of the magazine, the follower moves back, no different than any other lever gun with a tubular magazine. Except in the case of the Henry, eventually the tab will contact the shooter's forward hand, which will block the follower from moving back, and prevent the rifle from feeding another round. So most Henry shooters do the Henry Hop. When they feel the carrier tab touch their hand, or if they have enough presence of mind to count their shots, they will regrip the barrel further forward and allow the follower to keep moving backwards. That is called the Henry Hop.

I do not do the Henry Hop. I have a spacer stick that I put in the magazine after I have loaded 10 rounds. The follower shoves the spacer stick which shoves the rounds in the magazine back. I keep my left hand all the way back near the frame, so the carrier tab never quite reaches my hand.

poqXpg3uj.jpg




Here is the spacer stick between a column of rounds and the follower.

pn54TrKXj.jpg




Here is the spacer stick all the way back, after having shoved the last round onto the carrier. The piece of brass prevents the stick from entering the carrier and jamming it from moving. I hold the barrel just in front of the frame, so the follower tab never quite reaches my hand.

pmkNrTChj.jpg




My spacer stick is the same length as 3 rounds. So I am automatically only loading 10 rounds into my Henry every time. In addition, the spacer stick serves as a bit of a safety device. If the hand slips off the follower tab when loading, the spring will propel it faster and faster the further it travels. It follows that the follower will slam into a stack of rounds with much more force, the further it has been allowed to travel. One photo above shows that with my stick in place, the follower has very little distance to move, only about 1/2" or so, if It should slip out of my sweaty hand's grip. I like to think that would not allow the follower to build up enough speed to set off any rounds.


Before you ask, yes, Uberti Henry rifles have a piece of rubber in the end of the follower. I have no idea if it would really help if the follower slipped out of my hand. I do not know if HRAC puts a piece of rubber in their follower or not. I'm pretty sure the original Henry rifles did not have this feature.

pnuIsIcuj.jpg
 
Last edited:
As a long time CAS shooter I will agree with you. I see very few firearms chambered for 32-20. Lots of 45s, 44-40s, and a smattering of other cartridges. I cannot recall actually seeing anybody shooting a 32-20.

View attachment 959731

I have a friend in Florida who shoots black powder. He has a Uberti 1866 in .32-20; before he acquired it I was not aware that Uberti had ever offered that chambering. He figured Uberti used parts from the .38 caliber rifle which led to some feeding problems, but he’s pretty handy and was able to get it running. His lady shoots it; with Goex charged ammo it makes a distinctive sound. I think it’s neat.
 
Got a Golden Boy .22lr for my wife. I actually really enjoy shooting that thing, and so does she. Only thing is neither of us are big fans of the rear sight.
 
Howdy Again

I can only speculate that Uberti and HRAC chose to limit chambering their reproductions of the 1860 Henry to 45 Colt and 44-40 because of the relative ease of finding those cartridges in local gun stores. Yes, there are shooters who do not reload, and they have to rely on what they can find on store shelves. Yes, 45 Colt is a lot easier to find than 44-40, but I can only assume that was the reasoning. I think a long time ago Uberti made some that were chambered for 44 Special, but those have not been available for a long time.

Over the years there have been calls to chamber the Henry for the much more easily available 38 Special, but that would result in a really heavy gun. My 44-40 Henry with its 24" barrel weighs 9 pounds 15 ounces unloaded. It weighs a full pound more than a Model 1873 Winchester with a 24" barrel. If chambered for 38 Special, with a smaller hole down the barrel, it would weigh even more. That is why the Henry has never been chambered for 38 Special. .......

Driftwood, curiously, I own a Miroku-made Winchester 1866, purchased back on March 5 of this year, interestingly made in ..... wait for it ....... wait foooooor iiiit...... .38 SPECIAL. YEEEEUP. The 1866, AKA, "Improved Henry." :D I think it's a good caliber for this rifle (24" barrel) but, oh yeah, it is heavy. Later I bought a Miroku 1873 in .45 Colt, a "long rifle" with a 26" barrel but half magazine. It is lighter than the 1866! Probably no surprise. The .38 hole in the 1866's barrel does add weight ... but I wonder if the brass does too.

I like both rifles a lot.

I don't think Miroku makes the 1860 Henry but I like what I see from Uberti. But atleast the Miroku "Improved Henry" is available in .38SP.
Don't drop one on your toes! :what:
 
Driftwood, curiously, I own a Miroku-made Winchester 1866, purchased back on March 5 of this year, interestingly made in ..... wait for it ....... wait foooooor iiiit...... .38 SPECIAL. YEEEEUP. The 1866, AKA, "Improved Henry." :D I think it's a good caliber for this rifle (24" barrel) but, oh yeah, it is heavy. Later I bought a Miroku 1873 in .45 Colt, a "long rifle" with a 26" barrel but half magazine. It is lighter than the 1866! Probably no surprise. The .38 hole in the 1866's barrel does add weight ... but I wonder if the brass does too.

I like both rifles a lot.

I don't think Miroku makes the 1860 Henry but I like what I see from Uberti. But atleast the Miroku "Improved Henry" is available in .38SP.
Don't drop one on your toes!

You will notice I only mentioned the Henry as not being available in 38 Special.

Uberti has been chambering their replica of the Winchester Model 1866 for 38 Special for many years.

Perhaps I should explain. Both the barrel and magazine of the Henry are machined from one solid bar of steel. The magazine is first milled out as two 'fins' under the barrel, then it is formed into the semicircular shape. I recall reading that when Aldo Uberti and Val Forgett II were trying to figure out how to make the barrel and magazine many years ago, that is how they decided to do it. Which is exactly how the barrel and magazine of the originals were made. That is part of the reason they are so heavy.

The Model 1866 Winchester, which is also sometimes known as the 'Improved Henry' was the first of the Winchesters to use a separate tube suspended under the barrel for a magazine. That is why the Henry is so much heavier than a Winchester Model 1866, 1873, or 1892 of the same barrel length. You may have noticed I said my Henry weighs 1 pound more than a Winchester Model 1873 of the same barrel length.

Anyway, with the slightly lighter magazine construction of the Model 1866, modern replicas are made with the smaller hole down the barrel and they do not weigh as much as a Henry with the same barrel length would.

You are of course aware the original Improved Henry rifles were only chambered for the same 44 Henry Rimfire cartridge that the 1860 Henry rifles were chambeerd for.
 
I guess I have to say I'm surprised; I knew how Uberti made the Henry (I think we both must have read the same article somewhere .... ?) magazine, but I didn't realize it would make it significantly heavier. I'd think that the smaller hole would make a bigger difference -- maybe it does -- but I guess making the barrel & magazine that way would make it heavier as well.

Yes, I knew the Henry & 1866 were both made in .44 Henry. A book I recently obtained, IIRC titled THE FIRST WINCHESTER, details the Henry and 1866 models fairly thoroughly, with many interesting photos and other details. Some 1866 models, apparently intended for South American markets, were made in centerfire calibers. I recall a photo of one model's bolt that had both centerfire firing pin as well as the dual rimfire firing pins. There were apparently experimental (?) models made with sliding dust covers like the 1873, as well as a "transitional" 1860 Henry that had the barrel & magazine of the 1860, but a rectangular side loading gate as well.

Someday someone will write a book encompassing every different model of every leveraction rifle the company ever made ~~~~~~and an 18 wheel Mack Truck will be required to transport just one copy!!!!!!:evil:
 
You know, I've had buyer's remorse for having bought a Henry Big Boy Steel in 327 some months ago as almost immediately upon doing so the world went in a bizarro direction so that I had to put all of my effort and attention into getting my AR projects finished and I haven't even had time to put the sights I bought on the Henry, much less shoot it.

Then the news Henry was going to side-gates came out and I was really bummed until I realized the 327 wasn't included. So now I'm glad I bought it! Finding ammo was a herculean task, but I managed it. This rifle isn't a combat arm so the lack of the loading gate does not trouble me and with a 20" barrel ten rounds in the tube is plenty.

Maybe the world will slow down in 2021 so that I can turn my attention back to less urgent firearms projects.
 
Someday someone will write a book encompassing every different model of every leveraction rifle the company ever made ~~~~~~and an 18 wheel Mack Truck will be required to transport just one copy!!!!!!

Good luck with that. My Marlin book is about 2" thick. I have a couple Winchester books and they are each about 2" thick. The Henry book by Les Quick is only about 1/2" thick, but it is only about one rifle.

This little book case holds most of my gun reference books. It would not take a Mack Truck to move it, but it does hold quite a few gun books. Not shown are a few of my Smith and Wesson books.

pnbb1rfCj.jpg
 
@Driftwood Johnson Thanks for the reply. If CAS doesn't have a rule on tube mag capacity, I don't see how a 16 inch long barrel lever action that could hold 15 rds of .38 Short Colt or 11 rds of .45 Cowboy Spl wouldn't be popular. That's one major reason I would like to see all the lever manufacturers, specifically Henry and Rossi, offer a rifle with the ability to cycle the short cartridges, the other is for people who live in places with certain laws that have limits on magazine capacities and/or semi auto firearms to have a viable option for self defense in their home.

I guess it's something that's not going to happen until laws get passed that restrict or further regulate all semi automatic guns when the demand is there. I tend to always see things years before they happen and think the demand is already there or will be there when others don't.
 
Good luck with that. My Marlin book is about 2" thick. I have a couple Winchester books and they are each about 2" thick. The Henry book by Les Quick is only about 1/2" thick, but it is only about one rifle.

This little book case holds most of my gun reference books. It would not take a Mack Truck to move it, but it does hold quite a few gun books. Not shown are a few of my Smith and Wesson books.

View attachment 960243

A-ha! I have that R. L. Wilson WINCHESTER book too! I might have some of the others, but it's hard to tell using my tablet. I also have a rather large Marlin book. We may be the best read members with regards classic rifkes, esp. Winchester, on this forum ........

....But I think you've got me beat by a light year .... or maybe even a parsec!:alien: :)
 
I have two Lever Action Henry 's a H001 GB .22 lr. & H004 .22 Magnum both 20" Octagon tubular barrels.
 
No, not yet. I am waiting for their interpretation of (haven't heard of it coming, just dreaming here) an Artemida in 30-06 with 26" blued barrels, nice wood and a single set trigger if possible! The darn canadian ban on russian imports would then not bother me anymore, as I could buy a great rifle from my friendly american neighbors
 
I have two .22 levers which I thought highly of until I started having issues with them. Both need to go back to the mothership and both will be going down the road.

I have a Big Boy Steel .357 and would like to add an X-model .44Mag. There's several on Gunbroker but I ain't paying $1400 for one.
 
I had wanted to buy my lefty (handed) wife a rifle. I inquired of Henry if they made any left handed rifles. I got a slightly less than courteous answer from them. See for yourselves:
-----------------------------------------

From: "Henry Customer Service"
To: "grayrock...
Sent: Wednesday December 2 2020 2:56:47PM
Subject: Response from Henry Repeating Arms for Case
Hi G...,

Thank you for your interest in Henry rifles.

Left- and right-handed shooters can use any Henry lever-action, pump, single shot, or semi-automatic rifles without any issues. For this reason, we do not make special left- or right-handed rifles.
Jeff
Technical Customer Service Rep.

--------------- Original Message ---------------
From: [grayrock
Sent: 12/3/2020 9:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Response from Henry Repeating Arms for Case #

"Left- and right-handed shooters can use any Henry lever-action, pump, single shot, or semi-automatic rifles without any issues." That is not entirely correct. The rimfire lever actions eject the empty cases to the right. A left handed individual (being my wife, the intended gift recipient) would have the empties crossing her field of vision when aiming. A right handed shooter would not encounter that distraction. But thank you for your information.

--------------- Original Message ---------------
From: "Henry Customer Service"
To: "grayrock...
Sent: Wednesday December 2 2020 2:56:47PM
Subject: Response from Henry Repeating Arms for Case

Actually, it is precisely correct. Ejected shells will cause no more 'distraction' than the act of cycling the action would cause to any shooter.
Besides, if your eye is lined up on the sights, and the shell flies out of the ejection port low and away from the line-of-sight, it may not be noticed at all.
I speak from experience because I am a lefty shooter also.

Jeff
Technical Customer Service Rep.

w3UgcRQ.png


(I added the color emphasis.)


Do any of you shoot lefthanded? I am looking at this from a righthanded person's point of view and thought it would be distracting. Perhaps I am wrong. What are your experiences, you left handed shooters?
 
Does your wife notice empties being ejected across her vision, and if so, does it bother her?

I shoot lever-actions which eject up in front of my vision (leftie or rightie) and it doesn't bother me.

I've seen lefties bolt rifles and AR-15 rifles.

I can't say I really think there's anything wrong with Henry's letter, save it's maybe a bit terse. If they don't think there's a big enough market for them to make a good profit from a specialty rifle, I don't think they will make one.
 
Howdy Again

Winchesters, and the original Henry rifle and their modern replicas eject straight up. I see empties flying up out of the action all the time. Because I only load my ammo with Black Powder, everyone in a while a bit of hot gas or a flake of burnt powder gets in my eye and makes me stop shooting while I clear my eyes. That can be disconcerting. When shooting a rifle that ejects straight up it is a good idea to wear a broad brimmed hat to prevent any hot brass from making its way down inside your shirt. Trust me on this.

Marlins have ejected to the right ever since 1889. I am a righty, so I have no problem with a rifle that ejects to the right. Out of sight and out of mind. I cannot say for sure if I were a lefty whether or not empties flying in front of my face would bother me or not.

Anyway, if I were a lefty I think I would go with a rifle that ejects straight up.
 
Yea... that broad-brimmed hat is a good idea. I recall shooting my Uberti 1873 SRC one time and had a .44-40 case land on my head. Hadn't had a haircut in a while so didn't get brassburn. :D
 
For quite a while now I have been toying with buying another rifle in .308. I was seriously considering a bolt action with a detachable magazine but I have never been a fan of bolt guns. Operating a bolt just seems awkward to me when firing and reloading.
I would love to put my hands on a Henry Long Ranger in .308, but I have yet to actually see one in a gun store.
I have decided that until I do I have put off my quest for buying a rifle in .308.

I have a feeling that once I do handle a Henry Long Ranger I will be adding that to my short list of Henry’s that I own. :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top