7 parts - WASR 10 / SKS Hypothetical

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tortuga

member
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
189
I was visiting a friend and stopped into a gun shop. I've heard stories that the owner is something of a bag of wind (which seemed to be true), but he mentioned something to me that I'm not sure about.

Short version: Let's say I bought a WASR-10 (as pictured below) a3xypinshg951.jpg

If I wanted to take off the thumbhole stock and put on a traditional AK pistol grip / buttstock -- is this illegal?


Similarly, let's say I bought a standard Norinco SKS. If I wanted to put it into a synthetic stock (such as depicted below), is this illegal?

med-img-sks_monte_carlo_stock_for_sale.gif


Some of the information that guy was giving me was pretty obviously... exaggerated. He seems like a nice enough guy, but he was saying that this is an immediate 20 years in prison and it's impossible to do legally.

That said, I remember having someone mention something similar in a conversation I was having on this site. It was related to if the firearm had at least 7 original parts or something. I don't really understand it. I'm not asking for legal advice here, but I am trying to understand what the law actually is and if we can have a discussion about it.

***Full disclosure -- I have neither of these firearms and these photos are for illustrative purposes only (the pics aren't mine) ***
 
The gun store owner is probably referring to 922r compliance.

If one is assembling a firearm from the design as imported than one by law has to bring that firearm under 922r compliance which means having American parts to replace foreign parts.

There is a list of parts that makes up firearms and out of that list there can be only 10 of those parts that can remain foreign in their manufacture. The list of parts varies base on design of said firearm in question.

Do some of your own research by searching 922r compliance. There is a lot of information about it from various sources.

https://gununiversity.com/922r-compliance/

All of the above being said I have never heard of anyone being charged with non-compliance with 922r but I know it has been used as an “add-on” offense to a crime.
 
Last edited:
The gun store owner is probably referring to 922r compliance.

So then one could theoretically just buy a US made buttstock and pistol grip and/or US Made Monte Carlo stock and everything is just peachy?

Or am I missing something?
 
So then one could theoretically just buy a US made buttstock and pistol grip and/or US Made Monte Carlo stock and everything is just peachy?

Or am I missing something?

No you would need to make sure that firearm has less than 10 foreign parts on the 922r compliance list.

let me try and find a spreadsheet someone did a long time ago that really lays out what parts you can cha be on various foreign imported guns to bring into compliance.
 
So obviously this will vary on which parts are found on different firearms, so it’s best to find a “922r Compliance” list for the specific firearm in question then add up all the foreign made parts and replace individual parts with American made parts so that the sum of all foreign made parts is less than 10.

Here are the parts that count towards 922r, so a foreign imported gun if any changes are to be made from how they were imported they must then contain less than a sum of 10 foreign made parts that reside on the list below.
  1. Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings, or stampings
  2. Barrels
  3. Barrel extensions
  4. Mounting blocks
  5. Muzzle attachments
  6. Bolts
  7. Bolt carriers
  8. Operating rods
  9. Gas pistons
  10. Trigger housings
  11. Triggers
  12. Hammers
  13. Sears
  14. Disconnectors
  15. Buttstocks
  16. Pistol grips
  17. Forearms, handguards
  18. Magazine bodies
  19. Followers
  20. Floorplates
 
So an easy change is to change the trigger to an American trigger on firearms as that takes away #’s 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14; which goes a long way towards 922r compliance.
 
No you would need to make sure that firearm has less than 10 foreign parts on the 922r compliance list.

let me try and find a spreadsheet someone did a long time ago that really lays out what parts you can cha be on various foreign imported guns to bring into compliance.

So maybe this is stupid, but when you say "foreign," what do you mean?

If by foreign you mean "not American manufactured," you could just add American manufactured parts to it and it will always be less than 10 foreign parts.

If by foreign you mean "Not on the original design of the weapon," it gets a lot more confusing because WASRs were shipped to the manufacturer (Century Arms) and then worked on. There's also no telling how many changes parts were changed on a firearm before you receive it.


As a side note, who the [edit] holy heavens above [/edit] makes these asinine laws and what is the reasoning behind it?
 
Foreign parts just means manufactured outside the USA.

So it has nothing to do with design just strictly where the parts are manufactured.

As to the reason...*crickets* because it sounded good to some loser politician that desires to make anything related to firearms difficult.
 
Foreign parts just means manufactured outside the USA.

So it has nothing to do with design just strictly where the parts are manufactured.

As to the reason...*crickets* because it sounded good to some loser politician that desires to make anything related to firearms difficult.

Okay, well this is where I'm confused.

If it must have "fewer than 10 foreign parts." I buy a compliant rifle, and then add a bunch of American parts to it, then it should be that easy - no? There's no way it's going to add foreign parts if I take off an old stock and add an American manufactured one.
 
So for instance on a "Chinese SKS" taking the 922r list it would go something like this:

I've eliminated parts that are not found on an SKS so we are left with 15 Compliance parts, so by switching 6 of the foreign parts to US manufactured parts brings it into 922r compliance.
  1. Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings, or stampings
  2. Barrels


  3. Muzzle attachments
  4. Bolts
  5. Bolt carriers

  6. Gas pistons
  7. Trigger housings
  8. Triggers
  9. Hammers
  10. Sears
  11. Disconnectors
  12. Buttstocks

  13. Forearms, handguards
  14. Magazine bodies
  15. Followers
 
So for instance on a "Chinese SKS" taking the 922r list it would go something like this:

I've eliminated parts that are not found on an SKS so we are left with 15 Compliance parts, so by switching 6 of the foreign parts to US manufactured parts brings it into 922r compliance.
  1. Frames, receivers, receiver castings, forgings, or stampings
  2. Barrels


  3. Muzzle attachments
  4. Bolts
  5. Bolt carriers

  6. Gas pistons
  7. Trigger housings
  8. Triggers
  9. Hammers
  10. Sears
  11. Disconnectors
  12. Buttstocks

  13. Forearms, handguards
  14. Magazine bodies
  15. Followers

Wait.

If the SKS is a Norinco SKS, then all of the parts are foreign, aren't they?

So if I buy an SKS I have to start replacing parts?

I'm sorry. I'm not intentionally trying to be dense here. I just sincerely don't understand this law at all.
 
922r the way I understand it, is for "assembly of firearm" so with an imported firearm, it was imported with all the parts that are current on it. I don't think what the gun store owner was stating is accurate if he was talking about changing parts on a complete firearm that was imported as a complete firearm.
 
@Tortuga just as a disclaimer, I know enough to be dangerous on 922r compliance, so please do your own research. Hopefully, someone will come along that has definite answers, but I think that what I've told you has been accurate.
 
922r the way I understand it, is for "assembly of firearm" so with an imported firearm, it was imported with all the parts that are current on it. I don't think what the gun store owner was stating is accurate if he was talking about changing parts on a complete firearm that was imported as a complete firearm.

I appreciate you talking me through this. I don't want to sound like a pinhead but it still seems like the entire concept is completely obtuse (perhaps intentionally). That said, I have passing familiarity with 922r and I'm pretty much in the same camp as you in that I genuinely believe adding a Monte Carlo stock to an SKS or an American manufactured pistol grip / buttstock is compliant.

The only thing that would change the circumstances (from my limited understanding) is if the process of changing out the stock / pistol grip / buttstock renders the firearm under the designation of "assembly of a firearm."

Long story short, it sounds like the gun store owner is perhaps a bit full of bologna.
 
Okay, well this is where I'm confused.

If it must have "fewer than 10 foreign parts." I buy a compliant rifle, and then add a bunch of American parts to it, then it should be that easy - no? There's no way it's going to add foreign parts if I take off an old stock and add an American manufactured one.

Where 922r really has to be considered again in my understanding is with all the "parts kits" that were sold. But then there was also a lot of Saiga Sporters (at that time they had to be sporterized to be imported, so maybe that strict importation design plays a role) that were sold and when one started changing parts from sporter to a standard pistol gripped AK variant 922r compliance had to be considered. This example is similar to changing an SKS to a pistol gripped stock I would surmise. So it's still not totally clear to me.
 
@illinoisburt doing a search on 922r, illinoisburt seems to have some knowledge to share on 922r compliance. There are a few posts where he said making changes to an SKS one must consider 922r. So I may be in error, in the fact that completed imported firearms such as a Chinese SKS when changing any parts one must consider 922r compliance. Maybe he'll see this and provide some insight.
 
@illinoisburt doing a search on 922r, illinoisburt seems to have some knowledge to share on 922r compliance.

Thanks for the thoughts, but at best I've stayed at a Holiday Inn Express occasionally rather than a guru. It's actually a very complex set of rules which can be somewhat contradictory so nothing we post here is the final say in how things work.

The basics are pretty well covered above. The government essentially banned importing new non-sporting (ie military style) semi auto rifles and added the 922r rules to prevent folks from going around the bans by assembling them stateside from imported parts kits. For various reasons they settled on the parts-counting scheme to define what counted as a banned imported gun versus a legal domestic gun with a few foreign sourced parts.

To make things a bit more confusing we need to keep in mind Curios and Relics (C&R) which basically says military arms in original configuration are a separate category. This is not applicable to an AK pattern rifle as those were all select fire so for practical purposes no one could get one imported here after 1986 anyway. The WASR and all the other AKM type guns sold the past few decades have been assembled on a new US or modified foreign semi auto receiver with the appropriate number of US parts regardless the marketing as built from military parts kits. The best advice for changing parts on it are to find out which US ones were used to begin with and keep count from there.

SKS is somewhat different animal in that it was a semi auto from the start and many do have C&R status. In those cases keeping it in original military configuration or restoring it to such may be okay when swapping parts. Once you change to non-military configuration, or decide to swap parts on a commercial non-military gun you get into parts counting and have to meet the requirements people posted earlier.

I personally would not be worried too much buying an SKS which was already modified in some way (assuming not smithed by bubba's dremel!). However I would keep and use it as-is or go full parts count/restoration if it needed even the smallest changes by me.
 
Last edited:
This is honestly one of the most stupid fooking things I have literally ever read in my life. I must be having a stroke or on some kind of an acid trip because I'm having a hard time believing this is real life.

To clarify:

So what you're telling me is that if I perform a cosmetic change to the furniture or stock of a firearm as an individual that in no way affects the functionality of the weapon, I'm suddenly in a position where I have to follow regulations designed for importers and "assemblers" of firearms?

Help me understand, if I buy an SKS that's manufactured in China, the whole damn thing is foreign parts. It was made by the Chinese. So if I change the stock out, now I suddenly have to start counting parts and replacing all sorts of other crap to make sure it's compliant with a rule designed for manufacturers?


Surely I'm missing something here. I've been wrong about stuff before so correct me if I'm wrong.



If the aforementioned assessment is correct, whoever came up with this regulation is so exhaustively incompetent that I can't even begin to imagine the motivation behind any such law or what its original intent to potentially accomplish was supposed to be.

Not only is it effectively impossible to navigate without the assistance of an attorney, but I'd be curious how something like this could even be enforced.
 
Last edited:
Unless you have a local law that says you can't have a pistol grip on a rifle (like in California) just do what you want as long as it doesn't change the function of the rifle. Like make it go FA.
 
Unless you have a local law that says you can't have a pistol grip on a rifle (like in California) just do what you want as long as it doesn't change the function of the rifle. Like make it go FA.

Yeah but the problem with that is if you get pulled over with it in your vehicle or the police execute a warrant at your house for an unrelated matter, you could be looking at 20 years in a federal penitentiary.

People get a lot more for a lot less in this country.
 
Unless you have a local law that says you can't have a pistol grip on a rifle (like in California) just do what you want as long as it doesn't change the function of the rifle. Like make it go FA.
That may be the reality of many people's actions, except this question is in the legal section. The regulations exist and are complex.
 
Unless you have a local law that says you can't have a pistol grip on a rifle (like in California) just do what you want as long as it doesn't change the function of the rifle. Like make it go FA.

Unfortunately, the regulations on 922r are not that simple. Like I said I’ve never heard of anyone getting jammed up just for a 922r violation but I’ve read/been told that it is used for add-on offenses. And even that doesn’t change the fact that the regulation is still out there for an over zealous cop/attorney to go after a person on.
 
922(r) applies to assembly, not to possession. That means that for a conviction, there must be proof that the accused assembled the gun in the proscribed configuration. (He might have bought it from some unknown party who did the assembly.) Being simply found with one is not a crime. In practical terms, 922(r) is a concern, mainly, for manufacturers and importers. And those people, in turn, are generally very careful to comply. That's why prosecutions under 922(r) are unheard of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top