Mr. Mosin
Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2019
- Messages
- 2,112
A conversation with a friend today got me to thinking, and to attempt to put my harebrained and scattered thoughts to text.
The saying “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.” does not ring true regarding firearms of any sort, but especially of handguns. What is exceptionally well suited deep concealment in suburbia is not at all suited for belt or chest carry in big bear country. What is excellent to stuff in a tackle box or pocket to off the offending venomous snake or small critter is generally not suited to tackling two legged threats.
People tend to forget that “one size” does *not* in fact, “fit all”, and we are especially prone to such in the firearms community. Each and every individual’s capability, situations both physically and financially, and ten thousand other factors all play into what is “the best” for any given individual in any given situation.
The saying “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.” does not ring true regarding firearms of any sort, but especially of handguns. What is exceptionally well suited deep concealment in suburbia is not at all suited for belt or chest carry in big bear country. What is excellent to stuff in a tackle box or pocket to off the offending venomous snake or small critter is generally not suited to tackling two legged threats.
People tend to forget that “one size” does *not* in fact, “fit all”, and we are especially prone to such in the firearms community. Each and every individual’s capability, situations both physically and financially, and ten thousand other factors all play into what is “the best” for any given individual in any given situation.