New Ruger Super Redhawk!

Joined
May 6, 2020
Messages
1,688
https://triggershims.com/ruger_double_action.php

https://triggershims.com/general_shim_instructions.php

Doing the whole shim shebang thing.

The feeler gauges - of which I have many - there’s no difference, between those purportedly made in the U.S.A. or China. After you “feel” the gap - you still have to measure the actual thickness of the “feeler...”

...with micrometer calipers made in Japan!

Same deal with the shims - measure their actual thicknesses first, before using them!

https://m.youtube.com/user/Levergun4570sbl/videos

Some nice videos up here.
 
Last edited:
20888A6E-788B-4FAC-A0AA-9245E878A2E1.jpeg

Pardon the use of improper nomenclature, if ever... I don’t really dabble with revolvers as frequently. Up there’s the bottom strap, when I was roughly midway through.

I really regret not taking a “before” picture - see those tool marks? The ENTIRE SURFACE was full of them - much coarser, deep, and totally like - did they miss a spot? Did they forget to install the windshield wipers before shipping your car out to the dealer?

That was some really crude machining left in the raw - you can see the remnants of it after 2 or so hours of work. 320 grit wet, finished off with 2000 grit wet - both wrapped around a Spyderco Sharpmaker rod as a base. Even my cast iron pans have more uniform texture, no joke!

1AD3355A-6410-4909-B166-0FC55B54403F.jpeg

Had to take care of the crown, too. Burrs from the rifling, and both dings and burrs from the outer margin of the crown. For heaven’s sake, Ruger... I know this is just a pistol and it probably doesn’t matter - but the lack of attention over the crown’s probably an indicator into how the rest of the stuff’s being taken care of!

F3655F43-AE4A-4F4C-B188-BD8787CD8932.jpeg

Don’t know what this part’s called, but that’s where the front sight assembly sits. Even this part was catching on the shop towel, with the sight assembly installed! Those burrs CUT!
 
Last edited:
E6AF0876-AD99-400E-9A5C-126D68128C3B.jpeg

This is where the sides of the hammer were slamming into... The edge of the hammer, and what you see above - they were wirecutter sharp. Half - finished contouring from the factory, tool marks still visible. Picture was taken halfway through my work.

F6BDB85B-F6B8-48CF-BA58-AED64E38C7B3.jpeg

Disassembling the trigger assembly... No fun at all! Mine was difficult to dislodge, which, when one thinks about it - is probably a good thing... But I couldn’t remove the tab / spring / plunger inside! I had to use some brute force with a pair of pliers (insulated with paper, or course).

2385BD90-D575-48F5-8AE1-534F07C33F55.jpeg

There was something messed up in the channel... Things were much better after the above intervention with, guess what...

...sandpaper!
 
Last edited:
84BD8AE3-EAF8-4663-BFF5-F2F39C63D6E4.jpeg

All those findings got me thinking... Before I install the shims, I should make sure there aren’t any burrs where they’d be situated! More sandpaper!

3B86BFC9-A34E-4E04-A32E-8B34C294FEDC.jpeg

Around the hammer pin, too! Surprised to see surface rust inside the frame...

DB36F7FB-C09E-434A-B706-C07761CE7867.jpeg

Had to be a little creative sanding the inside!
 
E17EAE31-F253-4EDA-9817-18D9CF544853.jpeg

DD205C2F-14A5-44A3-A10B-4387C44B481E.jpeg

Mine measured 0.018”.

DB3B4E89-82D1-41A1-912E-76C0E8B25D04.jpeg

2540F272-1245-44ED-92B6-D7BA0CCC86C9.jpeg

Mine measured 0.011”.

507EFDE9-A43D-4A77-B1DE-292D824809AB.jpeg

Trigger Clearance: 0.006”. Looks like there was some effort in “pre - shimming” the trigger, from the way it was cast, but not enough.

The one nice thing about this pistol is that I can’t insinuate a 0.010” feeler gauge between the cylinder and and the area around the forcing cone... So it doesn’t seem to be that much of a disaster!

I’m hoping it’s really tight there. Hopefully, not too tight to cause reliability issues!

EDIT: 0.003” forward, 0.008” backward... Not really sure why moving the entire cylinder backward and opening up the Barrel / Cylinder Gap to eliminate “End - Shake” is considered a good thing?
 
Last edited:
I'd read they've gone to a sleeved barrel, first one I've seen of that type. I've had mine since 2012. Right out of the box it wouldn't set off CCI magnum small rifle primers in DA mode. Went down multiple rabbit holes in search of the fix (primarily centered on looking for an extra power mainspring, which doesn't exist) and ended up dressing a few thousands off the hammer nose and shimming the hammer to eliminate the common Ruger problem of frame rubbing. That all fixed it and life is good. Other than that, no real complaints.

W5pFI00Zr6K8yx7sOgqfxlzk68y8rtM_J8rGfVuGCbtTwDIchDwLo-vYx-xZt1YX99c6Vn5=w1200-h675-no?authuser=0.jpg
 






The shims really just push the cylinder BACK, don’t they?



While End - Shake gets reduced, is this at the expense of a widened Barrel / Cylinder gap?

 
Last edited:


Endshake shims reduce forward movement of the cylinder, increasing B/C gap. The only conventional ways to reduce B/C gap are to set the barrel back a turn, or fit an overlength cylinder. Neither is a practical solution here.

This is what it looks like happens when one uses shims, based on my uneducated observations alone...

In the same thread, there’s a post with the above video (towards the end of it) showing that the yoke must be “faced off,” which makes more sense. This sounds like the part everybody chose to forget!



Apparently, proper End - Shake and Barrel / Cylinder Gap remediation is one involved process! :confused:

I wonder how it's done on a Ruger...

Simple enough to understand, though.
 
Last edited:
Is this your first Ruger? Ruger has always been marketed as the "working man's gun". They have always reduced costs by eliminating what they considered to be frivolous finish work and it was their selling point compared to S&W and Colt. So the things you're pointing out here are typical of the brand. The problem is that S&W doesn't do a lot of that any more either.
 
Sort of my first.

There was this 7 - shot GP100 in .357 Magnum that was shipped over by Sportsman’s Warehouse which I nearly purchased once (4473 denial). I was glad I didn’t end up getting stuck with it - THAT one would’ve required lots of work.

I think they went a little too far in dissing “the working man,” from the price standpoint alone.

The “blemishes” on my revolver have resulted in cuts that bled from basic handling, from areas on the pistol I wouldn’t have expected.
 
Last edited:
You have to remember, that mantra goes back to 1949. Back when Colt and S&W were the pinnacle of firearms finishing. Back then the difference was more profound than it is now. The Ruger Standard Auto was their first commercial firearm and it was made more affordable by using a tubular receiver on top of a stamped sheetmetal grip frame. At a time when Colt and S&W autos were all milled steel.

This is one of the reasons why Rugers are so popular as custom guns. Not only do their designs make for excellent conversion platforms, they leave a lot of room for improvement in the fit and finish department. Their designs usually leave plenty of "meat" there to work with.
 
I'd read they've gone to a sleeved barrel, first one I've seen of that type. I've had mine since 2012. Right out of the box it wouldn't set off CCI magnum small rifle primers in DA mode. Went down multiple rabbit holes in search of the fix (primarily centered on looking for an extra power mainspring, which doesn't exist) and ended up dressing a few thousands off the hammer nose and shimming the hammer to eliminate the common Ruger problem of frame rubbing.View attachment 1069997

Would shims alone have corrected the issue?

I just had this rogue thought - maybe the shims need to be applied asymmetrically :eek:
 
Would shims alone have corrected the issue?

I just had this rogue thought - maybe the shims need to be applied asymmetrically :eek:

It's possible but I put the shims on order and being impatient, went ahead and started working the hammer nose until I had 100% reliability, then added the shims for additional insurance (obvious rubbing on one side). I would have never thought the hammer nose was the problem, but some very helpful posters on the Ruger forum assured me it was, and they were right. I used a medium Arkansas oil stone. That hammer is hard as Hades.
 
I would like to hear what the results are when you finish doing that to the rest of the lockwork. I bet the action is pretty slick when you're done.

Sure will - I'll post a video.

There's still a bunch of things coming through the mail, though - various shims and springs - give me a couple of weeks.

I'm trying to find a way to polish certain areas of the internal surfaces somewhat - that task's difficult for my amateurish hands.
 
Last edited:
Just got word from Ruger that this pistol came into being in October 2021 and was originally shipped to Shreveport, LA :)
 
Last edited:
CFE49CF4-6791-4B11-8628-10F8E5496A0C.jpeg

Mail from TriggerShims arrived today!

Hammer Dog Shims installed. Two of the red shims (0.005”) actually measured 0.0045”, likely by design - that’s the only color with 4 of them in this pack.

0.011” (measured slack) - 0.002” (desired slack) = 0.009 (total shim space) = two of the 0.0045” shims.

Measure your feelers, measure your shims!

Now, if only the rest of the parts would arrive sooner...
 
Last edited:
37F3B91B-DCD3-4903-8CA3-DE5209B5E03F.jpeg

More burrs!

THAT'S what scratched my feelers...

Got to make sure those nice shims have a flat surface to lay on!

Note the tiny remnants of surface rust...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top