Ultrawhatever!!
Howdy!
If a brush removes the product, as many claim(and I believe), then a bullet will remove it also.
ClayinAR claims this is similar to "case hardening" but I see a major difference, since there is no "coating" created with case hardening, but a chemical change in the outer layer of the treated steel. This can actually extend a few thousandths of an inch BELOW the surface, and is NOT easily removed by a simple brushing.
I've seen similar claims for a variety of products over the last fifty years or so, and most just don't prove to be as revolutionary as they claim.
Years ago, marketers would drain the oil from cars and run them for miles with "NO DAMAGE" to the engine. If all this hype were fact, nothing would ever wear out, and I see no evidence of that being the case.
Moly wear reducers have been around since the sixties and are useful as means of reducing friction(it's been used as bullet coatings and camshaft installation lube). Personally, I would tend to believe it would make more sense to apply the product to the bullet rather than the barrel. That way, each shot would reapply the material rather than wear it off.
This stuff may be the greatest thing since sliced bread, but I have little confidence in the claims. Show me some hard data, done by a lab with no dog in the fight. So far, I haven't seen anything close to that sort of presentation.
Thanks for your time.