thub
Member
Has anyone used the Bushnell 3200 riflescopes on their guns? What do you think about them?
The 3x9 Team Primos scopes that I have seen were priced at 199, but I do not believe they had the BDC reticle. The last price I could find on the BDC model was the same you have found on e-bay. This was at www.midwayusa.com, the last time they had them in stock. From the best information I had, they were a Monarch sold as a promotion. Do not ask what Team Primos was supposed to be, maybe someone else knows. On another forum they said it was like Team RealTree. Go figure. Good price. However, www.natchezss.com has the Sightron SII 3-9x42 for 199.95 and is probably a better scope. Plus there is a 50 dollar rebate coupon down loadable from www.sighton.com. 150 bucks for a Sightron SII is a steal. I just picked up a SII Big Sky from midway for 300 bucks including shipping and there is a 75 dollar rebate. It has the climate control coating that is like the Bushnell rainguard. So many deals, I wish I had unlimited funds.Is this a good price for a Team PRimos? BTW , are these still being made by Nikon or discontinued ? Most say this has the quality of a Monarch for less price.
copy and paste
http://cgi.ebay.com/NIKON-Team-Primos-3-9x40-Riflescope-w-BDC-Reticle-8435-/280486440372?
I agree the Sightron SII is awesome and the Vortex Viper 2x7s are being closed out. The Sightron is made in Japan and that particular Vortex in the Phillipines I believe. I do not own any Vortex products, but hear only great reviews. Only their Crossfire line is made in China, so imo I would stay away from them. The Elite 4200 is awesome also, as well as the Monarch. All except the Vortex, as I have no experience with them, can do 99 percent of what scopes costing 3 to 4 times a much can do. In other words, there is really no need to spend the extra cash beyond these especially for this power range.It is a good scope but the optical clarity leaves a bit to be desired. I suppose I am just ruined by the Sightron S-II, Vortex Viper, Elite-4200 and Monarch (roughly in order of preference). All of which are worth the additional coin IMO (some models can even be found a bit cheaper depending upon features and magnification range desired).
I just looked up that Cabela price on the Elite 4200 3x9. That is a terrific price. I have to admit, the Sightron SII or the Elite 4200 are looking for a rifle to go on and at 150 bucks, the Sightron would be hard to beat, unless the Rainguard is really important.Nathan,
If you use google product search, you'll see several places selling that scope at $10 - $20 below the ebay price. Also, as an aside to the OP, it looks like Cabela's is selling an Elite 4200 3x9 for $199... at that price, if you don't need the extra magnification, might as well step up a notch from the 3200. dho3 is right, it seems to be an excellent time to be in the scope buying business.
I disagree on a holistic level, but when limited to general sporting use I very much agree (and I have a couple that cost a good bit more used as such). OTOH one would be ill-equipped if you include LR target, benchrest competition, et cetera (though I seriously doubt any of the aforementioned is the case here).All except the Vortex, as I have no experience with them, can do 99 percent of what scopes costing 3 to 4 times a much can do. In other words, there is really no need to spend the extra cash beyond these especially for this power range.
That is why I added for this power, meaning magnification range. But, I would still be happy using a Sightron SIII for LR shooting as opposed to many other scopes costing much more. I would also be just as happy using my Kahles, Trijicon or Sightron SII or even my Leupold VX-3 for hunting as compared to a Swarovski. In my comparisons I cannot justify the cost difference and I do not believe I would end up with any more deer in my freezer. Just imho.I disagree on a holistic level, but when limited to general sporting use I very much agree (and I have a couple that cost a good bit more used as such). OTOH one would be ill-equipped if you include LR target, benchrest competition, et cetera (though I seriously doubt any of the aforementioned is the case here).
I don't find magnification to be the primary problem (I find that many folks use more than they need for most any task), but rather a general lack of features desired for target shooting (for LR target they include: FFP, matched reticle/adjustments, ballistic reticle, et al).That is why I added for this power, meaning magnification range. But, I would still be happy using a Sightron SIII for LR shooting as opposed to many other scopes costing much more.