Should everyone have a revolver in this day and age

Status
Not open for further replies.

gym

member
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
5,901
I'm addressing this to gun folks, not someone who is looking at their first weapon. Do you "10 plus year," carry and target,hunting, etc, guys feel that having a revolver is still relative to have in the lineup, and why?
PS: just liking them is a reason also.
 
I don't know that everyone "should" have a revolver, but if you have a large enough collection I think you would want one if for no other reason than to help balance the collection a bit.

If you're a hunter then it is awfully difficult to match the energy of a large caliber revolver without having a large caliber revolver.
 
At the very least, you should have a couple you shoot regularly, and know ow to work properly, just so you can stay on top of them. Never know when you may need to use one that isnt yours, and its all thats available.

As far as being carried, mine dont get out much in that capacity these days. I just find the autos fill the role better.
 
One of the reasons I enjoy firearms is for an appreciation of the pure mechanical genius of them, the feel of precisely fabricated and lubricated parts moving in unison. A revolver is an excellent example of that feel.
 
yes, everyone should have a revolver. more reliable and accurate than an auto-loader. Doesn't jam, easy to clean, more of the powder charge is actually used to push the bullet... a revolver is the staple of any respectable gun collection. at least in MY opinion, anyway.
 
A big revolver is excelent for hunting and they tend to be more accurate than semi-autos at long range. Also for recreational shooting for reloaders because they don't throw your brass in the dirt. They are as close to reliable as a repeating handgun can be and are not ammunition sensitive. Six shots should handle practically all civilian self-defense needs. Revolvers are also safer in that you can't forget about the round in the chamber.
 
Not unless the shooter has a "Need" for one. Revolver's may not be for everyone, some ques. the capacity limitations, some ques. the semi-auto's reliability compared to a revolver. It really just all depends...
Me, I like and have both. I have had friends and family that don't like to shoot my revolvers because they say they kick more, and that would be true.
I admit, I would hate to see the revolver fade away in popularity, but I really don't think that will happen.
 
If you can learn to accurately shoot a revolver in da (without staging it), you won't have much trouble with any other trigger, pistol or rifle.
 
:D I posted that in mind when a friend asked me once.."Why do you need such a big gun?" I told him that I have it because I had a "Need" for it and that is all that mattered! -- My first love was a Colt "Python" and that was the very first non- .22 cal gun I purchased many years ago, and it along with the 1873 SAA are all-time fav's.
 
It's not for me to say what someone should or shouldn't have.

Most gun collectors/enthusiasts will have a wheel gun or twenty though. :)
 
I like my Smiths... For just about all of the reasons listed above. Balancing the collection is a good one, they simply can fire loads autos can't and acheive ballistics similar calibres in autos can't due to the ability to use slow powders. 10mm is *kind* of an exception, it is sort of a standard semi auto pistol magnum round capable of using slow powders quite efficiently, and thus can lie between the .357 and .41 magnums in terms of power with many loads.

For instance, the 9mm on average can get 1250+ fps velocity with +P ammo and 124gr. bullets. The .357 can too using similar fast powders and 125gr. bullets, BUT the .357 can also use slower powders and drive those same bullets to in excess of 1600fps, and all this considering similar barrel lengths and the fact the bullet is the same size and weight!

Then you have versatility... Running specials in magnums, and some of the large bores like the .460 can run a few different calibres. Smith is also making all kinds of new revolvers in all kinds of materials. I have a 686+ 6", one of my favorites but big and heavy, a 340PD that is 12oz. with five shots .357 and small and super light, and my wife has a shrouded hammer 649 5 shot .357. They make something for everyone, and I'd like their scandium/titanium .44mag. You can get 'em in all calibres, even auto calibres and with moon clips --have you ever seen Jerry Miculek reload a revolver? He can shoot an 8 shot Smith revolver like a machinegun accurately and reload it faster than I can any auto pistol or rifle. Amazing. They are most definitely still applicable in every way today, from competition, to defense, to combat, to hunting, to fun at the range. In a lot of ways, Smith and Wesson has kept the technology up to keep up with autos in a lot of way as to keep them relevant well into the future.

I would like to see some new revolvers chambered in some of the new short rifle rounds though, perhaps even the 6.5 Grendel or .224BOZ (or even a .44mag necked down to a 6.5mm bullet with a 6" plus barrel). This would be a new leap foward in revolver technology if you ask me.

Also interesting to point out regarding relevance of revolvers today is that .500 S&W mag revolver with the 8" + barrel has ballisitics similar to the .50 Beowulf AR carbine in 16" with several loads. Pretty interesting.

I been collecting them for years, autos and revolvers, and the last revolver was bought for my wife just a couple of weeks ago. I'm currently looking for a PSL, a Smith 10mm auto, and a 329PD, all at good prices either new or almost new, in addition to the projects I have in the works. So revolvers are definitely relavent for me.
 
One could do without an autoloader I suppose, but no revolvers? Perish the thought. ;) On second thought, I think we need at least one of everything. :D

mike
 
I gotem both and love them both. I conceal carry the semi-auto's in town and open carry the wheel guns on the ranch. It all works out in the end.

The Dove
 
Having a revolver reminds me of how good triggers should be.
It's nice not having to chase down your brass if you reload.
 
Sure why not.

Something posted ad nauseum is that 'everyone should own at least one pump shotgun'. I don't, and I can't imagine that I ever will. But I own multiple shotguns now and can conceivably see that I'll own a few more. I highly doubt any will be pump action though. So I don't believe that "everyone should own at least one _____________" of anything, but it never hurts.
 
more reliable and accurate than an auto-loader. Doesn't jam, easy to clean,
I dont know about that. Ive had revolvers (more than one too) lock up to the point they had to be disassembled to just get the live rounds out, and all my revolvers are much more of a PITA to clean than my autos. I may give you the accuracy part though, but only by a small margin.

If you can learn to accurately shoot a revolver in da (without staging it), you won't have much trouble with any other trigger, pistol or rifle.
I agree. Once you learn to shoot a DA revolver DAO, youre on the right track to properly using one. By doing so, you also become less trigger phobic with everything else, and can shoot most things a lot better.

Actually, everyone should have a machinegun.
What? Everyone doesnt?! :eek:

And just one? What fun is that? :)
 
Quote:
more reliable and accurate than an auto-loader. Doesn't jam, easy to clean,

I dont know about that. Ive had revolvers (more than one too) lock up to the point they had to be disassembled to just get the live rounds out, and all my revolvers are much more of a PITA to clean than my autos.

AK-

What revolvers do you have that jam and are more PITA to clean??? Just curious so as I don't buy any of them.

The Dove
 
Ive had two different S&W 940's break internal parts within the first 200 rounds of being new. Both required the gun being disassembled to have the live rounds removed so they could go back to Smith.

Ive had a few ejector rods back out to the point that you cant get the gun open until you fix it. Not a big problem, but one thing every new revolver should have a drop of Loc Tite applied to. The cylinder retaining screw on the side plate is also a good candidate for some Loc Tite, especially with the "magnums". Ive had the cylinder on my one model 29 drop off the gun during a reload because of it.

How you reload a revolver can also be a critical thing, and the empties must be dumped "muzzle up". Otherwise, unburnt powder and debris can get under the extractor star, tying up the cylinder. Keeping that part of the gun spotless is a key to their function. Youd be amazed at how little "stuff" it takes to do so too.

The cylinder gap can also be a problem, especially on SA guns. Ive had a couple of Ruger Blackhawks whose gaps were way to tight, and would tie up from lead fouling on the face of the cylinder, within just a couple of cylinders full.

As far a cleaning, Ill take cleaning one barrel over a barrel, and 5-7 chambers in a cylinder any day. Especially if Ive been shooting a lot of lead .38's or .44's from my magnum guns. Those shorter cases just add to the effort, especially if you shoot a lot and want the magnum rounds to chamber next time you load them. Autos are just so much easier to clean.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top