tacstar wrote: However HK & Sig are priced significantly higher than Glock.
This shoudn't have been the case unless you were looking at aluminum framed Sigs. The Sig Pro's (which have a polymer frame like a Glock) are no more expensive then a Glock. HK's are sometimes a little more then...
Glock. Why? Easy. They're by far the best. Put the M&P or the XD on this poll and it would make no difference, other then a few less votes For H&K and Sig.
Yeah personally I don't find 1,000 rounds a week to be a whole heck of a lot. And to get to 32k a year you wouldn't actually have to shoot but 700 or so in a week. That's only 100 a day. Yikes! I was planning on having my Glock a little longer then a year or two. :mad:
Only 32k and you've about worn it out? So if I shoot only a 1,000 rounds through my Glock a week then I can expect it to last well less then one year? That doesn't sound to good to me.
If Glocks really take care of global warming, cancer, pms and acid reflux as mpmarty implied I have to suggest you get one. Of course that would be my suggestion any way. Of course I did just by a G19 today also. :neener:
I'm wondering how the recoil varies in different grains of .40 ammo. For instance will 180 grain Speer Gold Dots kick more or less then 165 grain? I'm looking for something effective but with as little recoil as possible in .40. I'm an old 9mm man moving up. Gun to be used is a G23 by the way.
You're reading skills are obviously as elementary as your attitude. I don't carry my Hi-Point nor question it's quality. I also have a few higher dollar guns in my collection as you should've been able to figure out from my sigline (hint: there's one of them mentioned). Now get back to doing...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.