Recent content by Michael Thomson

  1. M

    Is it good the NRA got involved in McDonald v. Chicago?

    I disagree. Admittedly, the written briefs are the most important part of the case and oral argument simply provides Justices an opportunity to follow up or clarify arguments made in the briefs. In this case, Gura's brief was overwhelmingly on P or I and overturning Slaughterhouse, an...
  2. M

    Is it good the NRA got involved in McDonald v. Chicago?

    It just wasn't the best argument to make and just about everyone but Gura knew it. He pushed ahead with P or I because of a broader Libertarian agenda, not because it was the best and most likely way to incorporate the Second Amendment. Let him test his libertarian ideals on some other case...
  3. M

    Scotusblog.com thinks 2nd will be incorporated

    There are a couple things you need to keep in mind about this. Prior to Parker/Heller being filed, Gura was an unknown. He certainly was not a well known or respected Second Amendment attorney like Stephen Halbrook. Why should they have been excited about the prospect of a young...
  4. M

    Is it good the NRA got involved in McDonald v. Chicago?

    Alan Korwin's take on the issue: Oral argument in McDonald v. Chicago by Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America EYEWITNESS REPORT Mar. 2, 2010 [Out of D.C. and now on a ranch in Texas; didn't have time to get this report out before catching my flight; this is only...
  5. M

    Is it good the NRA got involved in McDonald v. Chicago?

    Gura's focus on Privileges or Immunities wasn't about the Second Amendment but about a broader libertarian/CATO agenda. I for one am very thankful the NRA filed its motion asking for time at oral argument so someone would make the Due Process argument. Gura's written brief spent only 7...
  6. M

    Scotusblog.com thinks 2nd will be incorporated

    If anything, it sounds like NRA's motion for divided argument to argue Due Process incorporation may well have saved the case. From Scotusblog: "The first argument to collapse as the hearing unfolded was the plea by the lawyer for gun rights advocates, Alan Gura of Alexandria, VA, that...
  7. M

    Proposed "Assault Weapons" Ban in Maryland

    MD "Assault Weapons" Bill (SB 516) Withdrawn http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=5412 Senate Bill 516- "Assault Weapons" Ban WITHDRAWN by Sponsor Tuesday, February 16, 2010 Thanks to the massive opposition and outcry against this extreme anti-gun bill, the sponsor has...
  8. M

    compromises in gun laws

    It's easy to talk about not compromising but compromise is part of the legislative process whether you like it or not. NRA doesn't cast a vote in Congress or state legislatures and has to work with the lawmakers they've got. If every lawmaker supported the Second Amendment as much as those on...
  9. M

    The NRA's interference in RTKBA litigation

    It makes no sense to make the easiest argument for incorporation? Are you serious? I'm all for P and I but I could care less how the Second Amendment gets incorporated as long as it does. P and I is like taking a foul shot from center court when you can take the same shot from the foul line...
  10. M

    The NRA's interference in RTKBA litigation

    Most of Gura's brief was on P and I, very little, 6 or 7 on Due Process. If it wasn't about something more, I think he would have spent more time on both arguments. Here are some interesting reads on the subject. McDonald Gun-Rights Case: Round One Goes to the NRA...
  11. M

    The NRA's interference in RTKBA litigation

    Exactly. Which is why NRA filed its motion for divided argument. I think it's also telling that the Court granted NRA's motion. It seems pretty clear the Court wanted to hear more about the Due Process argument. In contrast, Gura is spent most of his brief on P and I because he's more...
  12. M

    NRA steals time from Gura

    I don't really see the choice of Clement by NRA as that big a deal. Lawyers change sides all the time. Plenty of defense attorneys started out their careers as prosecutors. As Solicitor General, Ted Olson defended the government's position in the Campaign Finance Reform case before Supreme...
  13. M

    Petitioner's brief filed in McDonald v. Chicago

    251 Members of Congress and 58 Senators signed a brief in support of McDonald today. http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=13139 There is also a state lawmakers brief. http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=13140
  14. M

    251 Congressmen and 58 Senators Sign Congressional Brief in McDonald v Chicago

    251 members of the House and 58 Senators including Harry Reid Bipartisan Majority of U.S. Congress Signs Amicus Brief Supporting NRA's Position in Pivotal Supreme Court Case Monday, November 23, 2009 Fairfax, Va. -- An overwhelming, bipartisan majority of members of the U.S. House...
  15. M

    Pro-gun ownership but not pro-NRA?

    Compensation of 50 highest paid execs of trade associations, interest groups, unions I see a lot of organization execs on here that do considerably less than NRA or Wayne LaPierre and who make significantly more than Wayne allegedly makes. The Top 50: By Compensation Only...
Back
Top