vba
Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2008
- Messages
- 345
Um, no, not Glock any more. The Masada seems to have an interchangeable trigger group which allows some more options. Glock? Pinned and numbered to the slide.
Now, who else does that, and beat out Glock in a government contract to supply a large number of guns? With a interchangeable trigger group, serial numbered, which accepts different grip unit's, allows the company armorer to fit it to the soldier, and which comes on large "frame" and compact. Switchable on demand. Same with the slide units.
Nothing stays the same. S&W dominated the LEO pistol market as they were changing over from revolvers, and during that time it was the standard for US LEO holstered firearms. Glock came in with one that more closely resembles a revolvers manual of arms, and with some low ball salesmanship took over the contracting. Does that make Glock the standard, no, not so much. They didn't get the military contract. A different pistol did. The Masada seems to include a significant feature from the SIG.
Glock is old school now. Out of date. Without a revised trigger group they will descend into the ranks of Fudd guns. The clock is ticking.
Sorry Tirod, that's just drivel. Last I checked Glock is still number 1 in sales. What is so great about the P320'esk trigger group. If one needs to go from a compact to full frame, for example, you need new barrel, slide, magazines and frame. Might as well buy another gun, that to me is easier.
So is Glock out of date because of this gimmickry? I don't think so. All modern guns today still use "out of date" bullets, primers, case and powder. There is nothing really new under the sun. In essence they are bullet delivery systems.
The military contract, really? The military is your criteria? What military? How about other modern militaries that chose Glock, what they don't count?