New to Me FN Browning Model 1971

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tallball

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2014
Messages
7,804
This is an oddball 380acp pistol. It's basically the old-fashioned FN Browning 1910 with a longer barrel, large adjustable sights, "target grips" (a thumbrest on the left side), and a pinky extension on the magazine. All of these minor changes were to make it importable after the 1968 restrictions. My understanding is that they weren't very popular and were only imported for a few years.

But... I often shoot at 15 yards, and none of my 380acp pistols are as accurate as I would like at that distance. Even the service-type pistols like the Colt Government Model 380 have smallish fixed sights and shortish barrels. I thought it would be nice to have a 380acp pistol with a longer barrel and larger, hopefully adjustable, sights to help make up for my aging eyes and mediocre shooting skills. I already have plenty of revolvers, 22's, and larger-caliber semi-automatic pistols that help make up for my deficiencies.

I have a Beretta Model 100, which is basically one of their smaller 32acp SA pistols with a longer barrel and adjustable sights. It is pretty darned accurate at 15 yards, and not terrible at 25. I started wondering if there might be a 380acp equivalent...

Enter the FN Browning Model 1971. I managed to win a decent-looking one on Gunbroker for a bid of just under $307. I picked it up from my FFL yesterday.

It has a few surface scratches and moderate finish wear in various places. From the frame rails, other interior parts, and overall condition, I would say that it was shot a moderate amount, but not really very much. I wouldn't be surprised if it was just sitting somewhere for a while. It was a bit dirty inside, and there was a little bit of light rust starting inside the magazine well and in the slide serrations.

It's a nicely-made pistol. Overall the fit and finish are very nice. The magazine is of good quality. The sights are large and look well-made. The trigger is a little heavier than I prefer (I'm spoiled), but is okay and has a short travel. The slide to frame fit is a little bit loose, but not terrible by any means. The factory blueing job was very nice. I've lightened the picture up so that you can see the markings and scratches and wear more clearly, but in person most of the blueing still looks great.

Ergonomically it's a little strange. I have XXL hands, and this basically a small-framed pistol with a longer barrel (a bit over 4") tacked on. I will have to be conscious of the grip safety - it isn't as effortless as the one on my 1903. (The 1910 is supposed to be a minor improvement on the 1903, IIRC. The way the barrel fits into the slide and frame is very similar.) It doesn't hold open after the last round is fired, which is mildly annoying, but basically unimportant for a range toy. The takedown isn't as easy as some, but overall not too bad. I can take it down in less than a minute after only the third time.

I would have to say that it points naturally and well for me. If I just point it at something and then check the sights, it tends to be pretty close to spot on. Even with the long barrel it balances nicely. I've been very busy lately and won't get to shoot it until next weekend. I'll post a range report after I do. It's kind of an odd little pistol, but I like quirky handguns, so it was an appropriate 53rd birthday present to myself. I'm looking forward to shooting it! :)

 
Last edited:
It's kind of an odd little pistol, but I like quirky handguns, so it was an appropriate 53rd birthday present to myself. I'm looking forward to shooting it! :)

Oh, to be 53 again. :( I have a 1955 model in almost new condition and I greatly prefer it to to 1971 model. That being said, the 1910's, 1955,s and 1971's are well-made pistols that are enjoyable to shoot. I hope you have a great time with your '71. :thumbup: ..... and enjoy being 53, for the infirmities of aging will come soon enough.
 
Tallball

In a bit of a strange coincidence, while looking through some old back issues of Guns and Ammo magazine, I came across this article in the February 1973 issue on what was currently available back then in .380 pistols. Pretty interesting selection and check out the retail price on the Browning Model 1971; it was the lowest price of all the different guns!

iKXQZG3.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all of the kind comments. That's a very cool old picture. I guess that they had been making them almost non-stop since 1910, so the production costs must have been pretty low by 1973.

I couldn't help but notice that the overall shape reminds me very much of my Buck Mark. Maybe it's not a coincidence. :)
 
A) I think the FN Model 1971 is to the Model 1955 what the S&W Model 14 is to the Model 10, if that makes any sense. I used to wonder why we did not see target versions of combat automatics the way we did with revolvers. I don't wonder any more, because every possible automatic pistol niche seems to be filled these days.

B) With reference to bannockburn's 1973 magazine article, why on earth did a Llama 380 cost more than the Astra or FN? Was the demand for 1911-style pistols strong enough back then to allow them to charge more? I thought that was a recent thing. Or maybe those prices were just MSRPs, and the real prices were significantly different.
 
Hmm the spread on those three pistols seems to be the difference in 1973 between 30 hours work and 31 hours work for Joe Burger Flipper. Easily not that big a deal. Yeah about that time there were a few folks that looked at the Llama and thought "just like a 1911 only conceal able!"

I carried an FN 1922 briefly and a bud carried one a lot....he replaced it for carry with the Astra Constable. I went to Beretta 34 and later a Star S model....another .380 sized sort of 1911-ish lacking a grip safety, but having a very dependable thumb safety. Dad played with an HsC but decided to go two inch .38 Special instead.

-kBob
 
Those prices delude us into thinking they were cheap. In 1973 you could still get a slider for ~ 15 cents. I had a 1972 240-Z that cost $4200 brand new and that included a/c and a radio. A blue collar worker made about $150/week or less. I could live on $5 k/year. I paid $43 for a new Ruger semi-auto .22 pistol and $90 for an 870 Wingmaster with 2 barrels with vent ribs.
Now we make more money, spend more money and aren't really any better off than back then. The money is just worth less.
 
That's a great find. Really wasn't attracted to those '71 Browning's back in the day or the .380 caliber. Wouldn't mind having one now, especially at that price. .380's have come a long way since then and I now own a few.
When my father in law passed away 25 years ago I found the exact model Llama pictured above in the desk of his home office. Still in the original box with a price sticker of $68 and a receipt from Gibson's Department store dated September 1968. No ammo and didn't appear to have been shot. Ran a box through it w/o any problems.
 
A) I think the FN Model 1971 is to the Model 1955 what the S&W Model 14 is to the Model 10, if that makes any sense. I used to wonder why we did not see target versions of combat automatics the way we did with revolvers. I don't wonder any more, because every possible automatic pistol niche seems to be filled these days.

B) With reference to bannockburn's 1973 magazine article, why on earth did a Llama 380 cost more than the Astra or FN? Was the demand for 1911-style pistols strong enough back then to allow them to charge more? I thought that was a recent thing. Or maybe those prices were just MSRPs, and the real prices were significantly different.
The sighting rib cost extra! :D;):rofl:
 
But... I often shoot at 15 yards, and none of my 380acp pistols are as accurate as I would like at that distance. Even the service-type pistols like the Colt Government Model 380 have smallish fixed sights and shortish barrels. I thought it would be nice to have a 380acp pistol with a longer barrel and larger, hopefully adjustable, sights to help make up for my aging eyes and mediocre shooting skills.
So much this. So far the only gun in my collection that is anywhere close is Browning Black Label 1911-380. But it's not particularly accurate. I get better results an upgraded service 9mm, like a Walther PPQ Q5. I would really love me one of that FN 1971s.
 
Those prices delude us into thinking they were cheap. In 1973 you could still get a slider for ~ 15 cents. I had a 1972 240-Z that cost $4200 brand new and that included a/c and a radio. A blue collar worker made about $150/week or less. I could live on $5 k/year. I paid $43 for a new Ruger semi-auto .22 pistol and $90 for an 870 Wingmaster with 2 barrels with vent ribs.
Now we make more money, spend more money and aren't really any better off than back then. The money is just worth less.

This is true. The silver in a dime from 1964 is worth about $1.00-$1.10 today (I think silver is about $15 an ounce now).
 
Monac

Most if not all of those prices for the various .380s seem to be spot on with what was listed as their MSRP according to Gun Digest from that year. The Walther PPK/s was $140, the Browning Model 1971 was $89, the Mauser HSc was $120, the Llama IIIA was $95, the Astra Constable was $95, and the Beretta Model 70 (not listed), was $115.

I also found prices two years later for the FI Model D at $145, the Star Super SM at $126, the Browning Model 1971 at $120, the Walther PPK/s and Mauser HSc were both at $200, the Astra Constable was at $130, as was the Beretta Model 70.
 
I should have guessed they were MSRPs, bannockburn. What gun magazine would have real prices? Also, regarding the prices you found from two years later: Boy, I remember inflation was fierce back then, but I forgot HOW fierce. To this day, I think stopping runaway inflation was Ronald Reagan's greatest achievement in office.
 
Also, regarding the prices you found from two years later: Boy, I remember inflation was fierce back then, but I forgot HOW fierce.

During Carter's presidency we had double-digit inflation and double-digit interest rates. :eek: If you searched around back then, you could find certificates of deposit paying 20% interest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top