Dain Bramage
Member
Everybody mentions the cylinder in that photo, but no one notices the forcing cone. I don't think hot 125's are going to wear it out.
I’m assuming the cylinder is too short for punching out to .357 Max? The cylinder walls are certainly thick enough to contain it...
You'd need a new barrel too, might as well just get a fairly common 44mag Redhawk.
Cylinder is too short for a 357Max.
You could ream the cylinder for 357 Bain and Davis. 44mag case necked down to 357 caliber. If you can find an extra cylinder, I'd probably do it, but not on the original cylinder.
Just in case someone else doesn't get it; nice gun, load shoot repeat that's all.
Correct, it makes no sense whatsoever.The Redhawk is far too much gun for such a small cartridge case. The 8 shot makes no sense to me, the 6 shot only makes sense as a conversion.
I ran into one at a gunshow here in town 10+ years ago for $800+. As much as I love the Redhawk revolver and would have liked one in .357, I just couldn't do it.I paid $550 for my 5.5”,
I ran into one at a gunshow here in town 10+ years ago for $800+. As much as I love the Redhawk revolver and would have liked one in .357, I just couldn't do it.
Had to have one of these ever since I discovered they existed- vintage 7.2" 6-shot Redhawk, only produced from '79 to '82. Was just cruising the gunshow yesterday and there it was.........
View attachment 802933
View attachment 802934
View attachment 802935
View attachment 802936
View attachment 802937
Hmmmmm, a lot.What a great find. Your great grand kids will be still shooting that gun. How much does that bad boy weigh?
Thanks! I've got a 28 too. This thing makes the N-frame look wimpy by comparison.I am glad the OP got the gun he wanted. That said from my point of view that gun makes even less sense than the S&W model 27/28 makes. Seems like a way way way overbuilt gun for the cartridge. IMHO the only way a 357 Mag RH/SRH or N-frame makes sense is as an 8-shot gun. That said my humble opinion really doesn't matter much if the OP is happy with it. Shoot safe and enjoy!
I'll have to weigh it when I get home.
I just saw one of those yesterday. First one I've seen in a while. They were asking $900Had to have one of these ever since I discovered they existed- vintage 7.2" 6-shot Redhawk, only produced from '79 to '82. Was just cruising the gunshow yesterday and there it was.........
View attachment 802933
View attachment 802934
View attachment 802935
View attachment 802936
View attachment 802937
I paid $1000, private cash sale, no tax or call fee, so I feel pretty good about it.I just saw one of those yesterday. First one I've seen in a while. They were asking $900
Since I just recently picked up a M57, a .41 Redhawk is also on my radar now. A blued 5.5" would be perfect!I know how the OP feels, I stumbled onto a very, very clean 7.5” .41 last year for around 400 bucks... Finding a rare or out of print one is fun!
I saw a 5.5" Redhawk 357 listed at 49 oz. so I'm guessing @51 oz.Just stop at the trucking weigh station. They ought to have a scale with an appropriate weight range.
I saw a 5.5" Redhawk 357 listed at 49 oz. so I'm guessing @51 oz.
The one I saw was on armslist.com. I don't remember what state though. Good find, congratulationsI paid $1000, private cash sale, no tax or call fee, so I feel pretty good about it.
Honestly, I wanted one so bad, and this is exactly the one I wanted, I would've done $1,500 and still been OK with it.
So you're the one that's driving the prices into orbit!!I paid $1000, private cash sale, no tax or call fee, so I feel pretty good about it.
Honestly, I wanted one so bad, and this is exactly the one I wanted, I would've done $1,500 and still been OK with it.
Hopefully this Saturday after work. I've got a whole stack of new guns to try out for the first time!Nice find, being overbuilt and heavy should make it a lot of fun to shoot, especially 38 specials, let us know how the recoil is when you shoot it.