Thread title is the question.
I am looking for a .22 auto-loader. Honestly, my initial interest was in a Chiappa M1-22. However, after reading reviews of that gun, as well as see how much of it is polymer/plastic I just can't make myself excited for it.
That said, I like the idea of an M1 styled .22. After looking into it I found that Erma Werke made .22s patterned off the M1 carbine for almost 30 years. Having looked into these guns, there seems that the biggest issue with them anymore is that parts are expensive and often hard to get. Additionally, I have seen some comments indicating that there is a lot of pot metal in these guns and that the charging handles snap as they get older. Considering that any gun you could buy would be 20+ years old at this point that is somewhat concerning. What I have seen these go for between $300-$500.
Since the issue with the Erma is parts availability, the other M1 pseudo clones (marlin, etc) that have been out of production for a while also seem like poor choices. Until Ruger goes broke, the 10/22 will have parts availability. You can dress up 10/22 with both 3rd party kits or buy the version that comes straight from Ruger. Either way, it looks like you end up spending about $350. Obviously this would in many ways be the least like the M1. The action is entirely different. However, I have heard from people with the Chiappa that because the action is open on top, the expelled gasses from the straight blowback action can end up in your face. This seems like it would be a problem with any gun that mimics the M1s action.
So, those are some of my thoughts on these two, I was wondering if anybody who had owned both the Erma M1 and a 10/22 could weigh in and compare both of these two. My dad owns a 10/22, and I have shot them on several occasions. I like them. What are peoples thoughts on the Erma especially as it compares to the 10/22?
I am looking for a .22 auto-loader. Honestly, my initial interest was in a Chiappa M1-22. However, after reading reviews of that gun, as well as see how much of it is polymer/plastic I just can't make myself excited for it.
That said, I like the idea of an M1 styled .22. After looking into it I found that Erma Werke made .22s patterned off the M1 carbine for almost 30 years. Having looked into these guns, there seems that the biggest issue with them anymore is that parts are expensive and often hard to get. Additionally, I have seen some comments indicating that there is a lot of pot metal in these guns and that the charging handles snap as they get older. Considering that any gun you could buy would be 20+ years old at this point that is somewhat concerning. What I have seen these go for between $300-$500.
Since the issue with the Erma is parts availability, the other M1 pseudo clones (marlin, etc) that have been out of production for a while also seem like poor choices. Until Ruger goes broke, the 10/22 will have parts availability. You can dress up 10/22 with both 3rd party kits or buy the version that comes straight from Ruger. Either way, it looks like you end up spending about $350. Obviously this would in many ways be the least like the M1. The action is entirely different. However, I have heard from people with the Chiappa that because the action is open on top, the expelled gasses from the straight blowback action can end up in your face. This seems like it would be a problem with any gun that mimics the M1s action.
So, those are some of my thoughts on these two, I was wondering if anybody who had owned both the Erma M1 and a 10/22 could weigh in and compare both of these two. My dad owns a 10/22, and I have shot them on several occasions. I like them. What are peoples thoughts on the Erma especially as it compares to the 10/22?