What do gunsmiths think of the JC Higgins Model 10 12g recall?

Status
Not open for further replies.

londez

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
17
What do you guys think of the JC Higgins Model 10 recall on all of the 12 gauge models? It seems like every gun-smith I've talked to that's familiar with the gun and the recall thinks there was some other motivation behind the recall, like a fear of lawsuits, or anti-gun management taking over Sears. Considering how many of the guns Sears sold, it seems extremely odd that it would take them 40 years to find a design flaw serious enough to warrant a recall. The guy I bought parts from when I was fixing up my Great Uncle and Uncle's old 583.17 swore that they were great guns and would last forever if properly maintained. Of course, this has to be taken with a grain of salt when we consider that he makes money off of selling parts for them.

There are pictures floating around the internet of an exploded JC Higgins Model 10 12 gauge, from 1959. But if you also look at the failure report that accompanied those photos (I read it a year or two ago but can't seem to find it now), the High Standard Engineer who wrote it up said that the bolt-face showed signs of severe peening, which may have resulted in an excess head-space scenario. In this instance, the bolt retention screw prevented the bolt from exiting the back of the gun and smashing the shooter's face. I will look around and see if I can find the failure report anywhere when I have more time.

There was another incident, in 86, where a guy sued Sears because the bolt retention screw broke when he was pulling the bolt handle back and he whacked himself in the face with the bolt. The suit was eventually thrown out. Here is a link to the judge's report on the case; https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/812/750/1761760/

I was searching for more info on the recall a while back when someone in the comments section of a JC Higgins Model 10 Recall article said that their son had been severely injured by a JC higgins Model 10 when the gun exploded and shot the bolt into his face. Oddly enough the Model in this case was a 16 gauge, one of the variants that was not subject to the recall. I think that I have the pages for this and the 1959 failure report I mentioned earlier bookmarked on my old laptop. I will try to find and post them here when I get a chance, which might not be for another few weeks.

Like I said, I find it extremely odd that it would take Sears 40 years to find a flaw worthy of a recall when they sold so many of the guns. But I don't have any experience in firearms design. What do you guys think?
 
Your talking about a gun out of production for a half century. If the maker of the firearm decided to recall them for the receiver cracking or the bolt coming out in your face when fired thats good enough for me. I can't imagine any other reason. Why risk using one. Many were bought cheap and the bolt turned in for the buy out fee.. It's not a collectable gun so I'd put it on the wall. JMO. But my wife thinks my face is pretty and I want to keep it that way.

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?id=226190;article=20452
 
If this is what I read about some years ago, Sears (or whoever) would pay more for a bolt returned than the gun was worth. The problem was improper heat treating of bolts and/or receivers, making some (many? most?) quite dangerous to fire.

With no bolt, gun is obvioulsly rendered useless and some people thought they found 'great bargains' only needing a bolt.
 
Your talking about a gun out of production for a half century. If the maker of the firearm decided to recall them for the receiver cracking or the bolt coming out in your face when fired thats good enough for me. I can't imagine any other reason. Why risk using one. Many were bought cheap and the bolt turned in for the buy out fee.. It's not a collectable gun so I'd put it on the wall. JMO. But my wife thinks my face is pretty and I want to keep it that way.

http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?id=226190;article=20452

First off, the maker of the firearm (High Standard) did not recall the gun. It was recalled by Sears. After 40 years. Second, I've seen those pics in the document you shared. I've also seen the failure report for that specific gun from the High Standard engineer who looked at it in 1959, and while he was unable to reach an exact conclusion as to why the gun exploded, he said that the bolt-face showed signs of sever peening, and suggested that the likely cause of the explosion was an excess head space scenario. Third, I don't have a wife to admire my pretty face, so nobody is gonna give a crap if I smash it to pieces ;) Thanks for the input guys. Anyone who's handled or worked on them?
 
Wow! Man you brought back some old memories. When I was a young kid, I saved up my money from doing odd jobs and bought that gun for $15.00. Killed my first deer with it.
Thanks for the post.
 
Last edited:
First off, the maker of the firearm (High Standard) did not recall the gun. It was recalled by Sears. After 40 years. Second, I've seen those pics in the document you shared. I've also seen the failure report for that specific gun from the High Standard engineer who looked at it in 1959, and while he was unable to reach an exact conclusion as to why the gun exploded, he said that the bolt-face showed signs of sever peening, and suggested that the likely cause of the explosion was an excess head space scenario. Third, I don't have a wife to admire my pretty face, so nobody is gonna give a crap if I smash it to pieces ;) Thanks for the input guys. Anyone who's handled or worked on them?

Well you asked for info and you got some. If you don;t like it fine. Apparently you knew the answer to your question before you asked it. So why waste others time. Go get some mag loads and have fun.
 
Sorry If I came off as rude, not my intent. I'm just curious to hear more about it from people that have used them or worked on them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top