SKS serial number redo

Status
Not open for further replies.

castile

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
602
I have an SKS that I had mixed up the trigger group with another SKS then sold the other one off and now have a nice SKS Norinco all matching but the trigger grouping. I was thinking should I send the trigger group off and have it sanded and re numbered to match the rest of the gun or leave it alone?
 
Why not leave it alone?
It’s not like matching numbers on an SKS would increase it’s value by much, but perhaps some day years from now it might.
I never cared much for people that modify guns to increase their value or make them into something that they are not.
M1 Carbine “paratroopers” comes to mind. Back in the early 90’s nefarious people were making “paratroopers” out of ordinary M1 Carbines and trying to pass them off at gun shows as originals.
Changing, modifying or adding serial numbers kind of amounts to the same thing.

Not that you are wanting to do this for nefarious reasons...
It’s just not ethical in my eyes.

Not trying to start a fight. Just giving my opinion. If I am way off, I apologize.
 
I get it. I am not looking to sell. I had a colt 1903 that never had the rampant colt put on the slide. I was going to have it put on but sold the gun before I did. I guess I look at it differently, I have collected luger's and every part of most of them have the last two serial nos so many parts from other guns will match that no. People would buy and sell luger numbed parts that match their gun. I have always talked about how a 1911 that has only one serial no could have many parts changed and its considered an original gun. A Luger that has one part mismatched even a small one now has its value cut.
 
I'd leave it alone.

IMO if one renumbers a part to match the gun as you give in your Luger example they are committing fraud. The part they renumbered is not an original part but they are presenting this as so.

Swapping out parts to make a "correct" Garand is not the same thing. There is no representation that they are all original parts.
 
I had a colt 1903 that never had the rampant colt put on the slide. I was going to have it put on but sold the gun before I did.
You were going to deface a 1903, the beauty of which is primarily it's originality and condition, by adding a Colt logo?

That's like buying a Ford nameplate and drilling holes in the trunk lid of a '64 Mustang to bolt it on because the factory didn't. Or engraving the safety billboard on a Ruger Security Six barrel because Ruger didn't. . .

Please don't; just leave it alone.
 
In the lugers we did not have parts engraved but would take parts that came off of junk lugers that had the same last two numbers of which there are many in a 10000 number run that would match. It would be the same thing as getting parts that were made of the same maker that match your M1 carbine or garand to make it from the same maker. As far as the colt most all of them had the colt logo this one had it missing for some reason. It did not look like it was sanded down there was no trace of it so I assume it was never put on. The SKS I am thinking its not worth the trouble. I just like things that match but the gun is all Chinese original.
 
Not worth the trouble. Classic is selling them for 299 now or you can buy a case of sks.
 
If you are going to do something like this, the military force match way was to line out the old s/n without removing it and then stamp the new one preferably in a stamp type that does not match the receiver s/n font. That would make it clear that the current trigger group functions with the rifle. Also, there is enough stacking tolerances in an SKS that I would suggest that you ensure that the trigger group functions safely in its current rifle as by swapping the groups one might accrue some liability if the firearm is rendered unsafe and sold to another.

Two reasons that all matching serialized firearms obtain higher prices is that 1) the condition is more rare and more desirable as the militaries did not care about maintaining whole parts assemblies other than for going bang and 2) there was a significant degree of hand fitting parts so that a "parts" rifle might very well be a) unsafe, b) rough in operation, and c) suffer mechanical malfunctions due to ill fitting parts.

Sometimes you get all three in something like a Luger as these had a significant degree of handfitting at the factory and Lugers have a more limited tolerance for operational problems on a good day. I suspect that a fair number of rifles like sniper types or more rare k98's might also have this problem especially after the flood of low priced Yugo and Russian captured rifles were imported.

Like other collectibles that soar in price, this has caused a big problem in collecting Lugers due to fraudulent markings, counterfeiting, and parts switching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top