With Heller 2 case in 2012, a 50 page dissent opinion was written by a judge in disdain of court's actions essentially saying DC's ban on semi-auto rifle is unconstitutional under Heller.
This dissent was written by ... wait for it ... justice Kavanaugh!
-
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/inter...C748525791F004D84F9/$file/10-7036-1333156.pdf
"... the D.C. ban on semi-automatic rifles and the D.C. gun registration requirement are unconstitutional"
I cannot wait to hear what justice Kavanaugh has to say about SCOTUS gun rights/2A cases and we already know what justice Gorsuch will say, "... charter among 'We the people' ... This is what we agreed to as to what the government's powers are and what they are not ... What our rights are ... Bill of Right is a set of promises on paper ... What makes a promise worth the words on paper is the enforcement mechanisms behind it ... Our Bill of Rights is excellent ... Judges are the backstop to ensure rights and liberties, that is our job" -
https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...with-question-on-the-second-amendment.856201/
Justice Gorsuch looks to be turning the Supreme Court back towards "Originalist" thinking to accept the 27 amendments as sufficient modern evolution of the Constitution and SCOTUS justices being the backstop for ALL of Bill of Right's amendments, including the Second Amendment when the executive and legislative branches of government fail to uphold the Constitution. I could see them building on Heller ruling as there have been recent court rulings calling magazines "arms" and modern semi-auto firearms not in existence at the time of the writing of the Constitution as modern types of "arms" protected by 2A -
https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...t-an-assault-weapon-ban.861535/#post-11346558
First Amendment protects modern types of communication and Second Amendment should protect modern types of "arms", especially for those with physical disabilities, with "adaptive modern devices" to effectively defend themselves to include arm braces, optics, suppressors, binary triggers, etc.
Even justice Ginsburg supports Gorsuch/Kavanaugh's impeccable reasoning to possibly allow the SCOTUS to ENFORCE the Bill of Rights, once again, like for voting rights of blacks and women, to defend the minority gun owners' right to self defense. Of course, my two cents.
Why I think SCOTUS will grant cert on Worman v Healey - Heller 2 case