Is it worth putting an optic on a 10.5" AR?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TonyAngel

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
4,137
I've recently been looking for a replacement optic for my 1.5X ACOG and was considering getting a prism optic from Primary Arms, but I was thinking that it might be fun to put a variable power optic on it to stretch its legs a little.

I'm thinking something small...10-11" long, like a 1-4X or a 1-6X. I like the offerings from Primary Arms and SWFA. It's looking like these brands hit a good bit above their price point.

Opinions?
 
Once your eyes get old and decrepit the utility of putting a red dot or other illuminated optic will jump out and grab you.

I'm already running the equivalent of a red dot. A 1.5X ACOG. What I'm wondering about is the wisdom of putting more magnification on a 10.5" AR.
 
I'm already running the equivalent of a red dot. A 1.5X ACOG. What I'm wondering about is the wisdom of putting more magnification on a 10.5" AR.
Depends on how far you think you will be shooting mostly. It seems to me a sbr is mostly suited for use indoors. If you want to do long range shooting a longer barrel is probably in order.

Try shooting your existing setup at different ranges say starting at 25 yards and working out to maybe 200. See what you can do with what you have. Chances are realistically you will not need to engage a target rhat far anyway.

Unless you want to do it just for the fun factor. I have never been real fond of variable power anything. But I don't shoot at stuff half a mile away either.
 
Depends on how far you think you will be shooting mostly. It seems to me a sbr is mostly suited for use indoors. If you want to do long range shooting a longer barrel is probably in order.

Try shooting your existing setup at different ranges say starting at 25 yards and working out to maybe 200. See what you can do with what you have. Chances are realistically you will not need to engage a target rhat far anyway.

Unless you want to do it just for the fun factor. I have never been real fond of variable power anything. But I don't shoot at stuff half a mile away either.

Honestly, indoors is that last place I'd shoot my 10.5. No way. If I miss what I'm shooting at with the first shot, all I'll be after that is deaf and blind.

I know I can shoot it out to 100 yards on however big a clay pigeon is. I can't even see a clay pigeon at 200 yards.

I guess posing the thread was more out of boredom and looking for something to talk about, weighing the pros and cons, etc.

I figure this rig should be useful out to about 300 yards, which means I'll need an optic. I guess I need to decide between a 4X and the small size or a 6X and the slightly less small size.
 
If you're gonna use the gun for target shooting,and you just need some extra magnification, then yes. There are lots of people shooting 2, 3, hundred yds or more with SBRs, and making good hits all the time.

If you're going to use this as a defensive or hunting gun, it's a waste. a 5.56 loses a lot of velocity out of a 10.5" gun, and it's not really gonna hit that hard at long distance, so even if you hit your target, it's not the best choice for that job.

However, if you're adding magnification to a defensive gun so you can better see a bad guy peek around cover at 60 yds, and put one in his melon...
 
I have a 1-8x on my 10.5” 458socom and a 4-16x on my 10.5” 5.56. The optic is for the application, sometimes I shoot small stuff at the longer end of short range, or big stuff at the shorter end of long range, even with my SBR’s - can’t hit what you can’t see, and generally, I can’t see worth a damn.
 
I've made several attempts to like dot sights, but just don't. Not really a fan of irons except on "real" handguns. I put a 1-4X20 on mine. On 1X I find it much better than dots or irons up close and if I need to shoot farther have the option. It's not much bigger than a dot sight anyway, same weight as most dot sights with much better optics.
 
I've recently been looking for a replacement optic for my 1.5X ACOG and was considering getting a prism optic from Primary Arms, but I was thinking that it might be fun to put a variable power optic on it to stretch its legs a little.

I'm thinking something small...10-11" long, like a 1-4X or a 1-6X. I like the offerings from Primary Arms and SWFA. It's looking like these brands hit a good bit above their price point.

Opinions?

If it shoots accurately, I say go for it. A 1-4 or 1-6 would be fine for your use.

Another brand to look at is Swampfox Optics. I have one of their Tomahawk 1-4 scopes and am very pleased with it. They are comparable to Primary Arms in quality and price. I actually like the Swampfox a little better than the Primary Arms .

https://swampfoxoptics.com/lpvo-riflescopes/
 
I put a Vortex 3X Spitfire prism on my 9-inch 300 BO pistol. I can ring a 10-inch gone at 200 yard with subsonics with relative ease. It will shoot 2-MOA at 100 yards with subsonic ammo. Its my favorite walk-around gun right now.

g1iebYTm.jpg
 
I put a Vortex 3X Spitfire prism on my 9-inch 300 BO pistol. I can ring a 10-inch gone at 200 yard with subsonics with relative ease. It will shoot 2-MOA at 100 yards with subsonic ammo. Its my favorite walk-around gun right now.

View attachment 907964
I had the Burris version (actually 2) and as much as I like it the 1-4X variables work better for me.
I know I can shoot it out to 100 yards on however big a clay pigeon is. I can't even see a clay pigeon at 200 yards.
Yes a lot depends on what range and what targets you want to shoot. A 3 MOA dot will completely cover a clay at 200 and make that nearly impossible but a full IPSC silhouette is easy.
I have a 1-4X on my 10" Blackout and a 1-8X on a 14" 5.56mm.
 
I had the Burris version (actually 2) and as much as I like it the 1-4X variables work better for me.

I have a Burris MTAC 1-4x24 on a 300BO carbine and a Leupold Mark 4 CQ/T 1-3x14mm on a 556 rifle. I like them both but on the pistol and the way I use it, I like not having to think about what magnification I am set at. I simply use it. The only thing about the fixed 3X is it is blurry on really close targets. That said I still cut the head off a, slightly blurry, nope-rope at 20 feet with it last summer. Its rugged, just enough magnification to make 200 yards possible, and if the batteries die it is still usable.
 
I have a 1-8x on my 10.5” 458socom and a 4-16x on my 10.5” 5.56. The optic is for the application, sometimes I shoot small stuff at the longer end of short range, or big stuff at the shorter end of long range, even with my SBR’s - can’t hit what you can’t see, and generally, I can’t see worth a damn.

Yep, this is me. As much as I like the speed and thrill of banging steel, I also have lots of fun shooting at small stuff. For handguns, I like to shoot at clay pigeons at 25 or 30 yards. For long guns, what I have most immediate access to is 100 yards.

I’ve been shooting at clay pigeons thus far, with the 1.5x, but what I usually shoot at are those little practice golf balls. They pop up and fly when you hit em just right.

I got a ballistic advantage barrel and I suspect it’s a real shooter. The last time I took it out, I rigged a hoopty magnifier setup using a Russian magnifier off of an RPG launcher and put it behind the ACOG. I know. Don’t laugh.

Anyway, I only shot it to 50 yards, but 5 69 grain smks went through about an inch. I’m kind of itching to see what the pistol can do with some glass on top.

Right now I’m looking at a few scopes. The lpvo from primary arms, SWFA and, again don’t laugh, a Monstrum.

The Monstrum is getting good reviews and at the price, it would serve as a nice paperweight and reminder.

I know the short barrel is a handicap at longer ranges, but I figure it’s better than throwing rocks. And seriously, I’ve mentioned before that I’m a small guy. I REALLY like the form factor of the 10.5. Maybe I just built it in the wrong caliber.
 
I've made several attempts to like dot sights, but just don't.

Same. I have a lot of red dots, and have had a lot more, but I always seem to come back to telescopic optics.

Even with magnifiers, I just don’t love red dots on rifles. I shoot with both eyes open when in magnified optics, so making short shots with a scope isn’t a challenge, no moreso than a red dot, at least, and it always makes me cringe whenever I drop a 3moa dot on top of a target and totally cover my desired POI - for instance, a bunny at 250. There’s just so much more covered up by a dot - a guy can break the shot quickly by putting a .2moa crosshair Line within 1.5moa of the desired POI, just as quickly as placing that 3moa dot - that’s nothing more than tactics and practice. But the dot can never deliver the degree of precision possible with that crosshair.
 
Same. I have a lot of red dots, and have had a lot more, but I always seem to come back to telescopic optics.

Even with magnifiers, I just don’t love red dots on rifles. I shoot with both eyes open when in magnified optics, so making short shots with a scope isn’t a challenge, no moreso than a red dot, at least, and it always makes me cringe whenever I drop a 3moa dot on top of a target and totally cover my desired POI - for instance, a bunny at 250. There’s just so much more covered up by a dot - a guy can break the shot quickly by putting a .2moa crosshair Line within 1.5moa of the desired POI, just as quickly as placing that 3moa dot - that’s nothing more than tactics and practice. But the dot can never deliver the degree of precision possible with that crosshair.

I hear ya. I still have a few red dots, but have two of the little ACOGs and those are what I use on my rifles. The etched reticles are a lot cleaner than a dot and you can actually use the circle dot reticle of the TA44 for holdovers and unders to a degree, but I do like real optics. I too have never had a problem shooting a scope with both eyes open. The only real glass I have right now is the 5-20x nightforce on my .308.

Really all of this corona stuff and being stuck inside is starting to affect my thinking and reasoning. As I mentioned above, I am considering getting one of those monstrum scopes. I'll send the ACOG in and when that gets back, likely spring for a low power Vortex PST and put the monstrum on a dedicated .22 upper I just built.
 
Primary arms and holosun (partner co iirc) have been good durable optics for me. Hit a good bit above their price point is a good way to put it. Cant beat the 100% no questions asked lifetime warranty.
 
Well, while waiting for the scopes to come back in stock at Primary Arms, my ex called me and said that she found one of my scopes. I asked what's it look like? She says it's small and says Weaver on it. Man, my face lit up.

She found my Weaver V3 that one of the kids apparently put on their airsoft gun. I looked everywhere for it. Not in the market for a lpvo any more. It isn't perfect. There's some fisheye at 1X, but at 1.5X everything clears up. Stamped Made in Japan.

Love this little thing...https://photos.app.goo.gl/UzzZELq17QtaW1Kq9
 
I've made several attempts to like dot sights, but just don't. Not really a fan of irons except on "real" handguns. I put a 1-4X20 on mine. On 1X I find it much better than dots or irons up close and if I need to shoot farther have the option. It's not much bigger than a dot sight anyway, same weight as most dot sights with much better optics.
This describes my situation as well. All of my ARs either have iron sights or variable power scopes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top