Questions regarding load development

Status
Not open for further replies.

mels95yj

Member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
25
I recently purchased a DW Valor Commander 9mm, so I'm trying to come up with a load for it. I previously reloaded 9mm for a previous handgun and currently my 45acp. They've been so far apart, that I always struggle with load development and have to research it all over again. In the past, I've looked through reloading logs online and my manuals (Speer and Lee), read posts and tried the most commonly used ones. I laddered up the load with one or two OAL's, settled on one and stopped.

I've done the push and plunk tests, and mine measures over 1.2" with this bullet. So, any length of round should work. Coincidentally, my other pistol was the same way. I shot what was left of my other reloads which was 1.145", but they used Longshot. They shot fine just breaking in the new one.

I want a better understanding of everything because I'll be doing it again once I'm through with this particular bullet. I've got Berry's 124 gr. HBRN-TP, Win 231, CCI 500 and various brass. Winchester's Load Data has this very setup at 1.150" OAL and ranges from 3.9gr to 4.4gr. I've loaded 12 of each 1.150" at 4.0, 4.2 and 4.4gr along with 1.145" at the same grain measurements.

Here's my questions (finally).

1. How far do you go? For instance, if one of these current loads shoots fine, do I try others? Like maybe try 1.135"?

2. Since my gun can handle any length of OAL, shouldn't a longer round shoot more accurately than a shorter one?
 
I go as far as a load that runs 100% and does what I wanted it to do before I started.

I don’t know what your wanting to do with your Commander 9mm but if it’s not tiny groups at longer than normal pistol distances the plated berry’s should do it.

I wouldn’t spend a lot of time fiddling with OAL, if they don’t meet your accuracy requirements, try a decent JHP instead, they will be much more accurate.
 
What you are doing sounds about right. I like to load to the long end of the spectrum and with my 9mm guns I am loading that bullet to 1.155" to 1.160" and using the Win231/HP-38 powder at the same levels. Most of mine are at 4.2gr as that is what naturally drops from a cavity on my Lee Auto Disk measure. If I have a beginner shooting I will load that same thing down to 4.0gr and that also works well out to 25yds.

My biggest problem is at 25yds and open iron sights I can't see a 2" Bullseye any more.
 
I want a better understanding of everything ... I always struggle with load development and have to research it all over again ... I laddered up the load with one or two OAL's, settled on one and stopped.
Determining OAL and powder charge to optimize accuracy shouldn't be a struggle or a guessing game.

Over the decades, I have used the following process:
  • Determine the max OAL that will freely fall into the barrel and spin without touching the rifling (To minimize gas leakage)
  • Then determine the max working OAL that will reliably feed/chamber from the magazine by incrementally decreasing the OAL (Say by .005")
  • Conduct full powder work up to identify the powder charge that produces smallest groups (Reducing start/max charges by .2-.3 gr if using shorter OAL than published)
  • Incrementally decrease the OAL to see if group size decreases (Neck tension overshadowing gas leakage)
That's about it. No struggle. No guessing.

DW Valor Commander 9mm ... Berry's 124 gr. HBRN-TP ... plunk tests ... 1.2" with this bullet. So, any length of round should work.
Hollow base increases the length of bullet by extending the bullet base as shown in below comparison pictures

Federal 115 gr FMJ HB, RMR 115 gr FMJ, Berry's 115 gr HBRN-TP

index.php


From left to right, Berry's 124 gr solid base, 124 gr HBRN-TP, 115 gr HBRN-TP and 115 gr FMJ

index.php


When Berry's MFG introduced the HBRN-TP bullets with longer base, I was concerned about deeper seating of bullet base and I think Berry's MFG thought so also as they published recommended OAL as 1.160" for 124 gr HBRN-TP - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?attachments/berrys-col-pdf.896428/

Then came Hodgdon/Winchester load data for Berry's bullets - http://www.hodgdonreloading.com/data/pistol
  • 9mm 124 gr BERB HBRN-TP W231/HP-38 COL 1.150" Start 3.9 gr (920 fps) - Max 4.4 gr (1,037 fps)
Win 231 ... Load Data ... at 1.150" OAL and ranges from 3.9gr to 4.4gr. I've loaded 12 of each 1.150" at 4.0, 4.2 and 4.4gr along with 1.145" at the same grain measurements.
I would suggest testing at 1.150" first and adding 4.3 gr powder charge.

So your initial powder work up would look like - Berry's 124 gr HBRN-TP at 1.150" with 4.0, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 gr of W231/HP-38

And if range test shows accuracy developing at 4.3 gr, you can incrementally decrease the OAL to see if group size decreases (W231/HP-38 is dense powder so powder compression shouldn't be an issue but if you are concerned, we can do max case fill calculations).

So your subsequent test rounds could be - Berry's 124 gr HBRN-TP at 4.3 gr W231/HP-38 with 1.150", 1.145", 1.140" and 1.135"

If shorter OAL produce smaller group, use shorter OAL. (And note reduction in powder charge due to using shorter than published OAL)

Most of mine are at 4.2gr as that is what naturally drops from a cavity on my Lee Auto Disk measure
Many shooters use 4.3 gr W231/HP-38 with 124 gr bullets as higher powder charge produced slightly greater accuracy.

We have resolved the in-between Auto Disk hole drop issue a long time ago with this $1 DIY mod - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/working-diy-micro-auto-disk.741988/

index.php
 
Last edited:
Yeup. Use a hex head set screw or just switch the Lee Auto Drum. I happen to like that 4.2gr at 1.155" with both the hollow base bullet and the flat base bullets. The published starting load is 3.9gr and that would not fully cycle my PT92 enough to lock the slide on the last round. Though a bump to just 4.0gr and everything was Honky/Dory.
 
I believe, and have some data to support the idea, that deeply seated bullets perform better. We (members of the Original CZ Forum) have 2 theories as to why this might be, but it seems to hold that 9mm cartridges like at least 0.200" of bullet inside the case, and accuracy seems to improve as you approach 0.250". Obviously this is not always possible, but it's considered a goal when planning your OAL.

However some 1911's are known to have definite OAL preferences for best feeding. So you may in fact have a 'tug of war' between these 2 "wants". Only range time will sort it out.

If feeding was not an issue, I'd be loading these closer to 1.130", giving you an insertion depth close to 0.235".

Hope this helps.
 
Thank you everyone trying to get it through this thick skull. I went to range today and tested what I had. I had the target at 15 yards, but only had a few decent groupings. I’m going to start over and try it again at 10 yards. The 4.0 rounds cycled fine, but was the most sporadic. I’ll skip these. This is a new pistol with only 400 rounds through it, so I’m still learning it and the sights. Plus, the eyes aren’t what they used to be.

I don’t know what your wanting to do with your Commander 9mm but if it’s not tiny groups at longer than normal pistol distances the plated berry’s should do it.

I’m eventually going to carry it in the summer and the 45acp in the winter. Since 9mm is cheaper to shoot, I plan on lots more range time with it. I want to closely mirror factory rounds.


Determining OAL and powder charge to optimize accuracy shouldn't be a struggle or a guessing game.

So your subsequent test rounds could be - Berry's 124 gr HBRN-TP at 4.3 gr W231/HP-38 with 1.150", 1.145", 1.140" and 1.135"

If shorter OAL produce smaller group, use shorter OAL. (And note reduction in powder charge due to using shorter than published OAL)

This is confusing me. You say keep the charge at 4.3 while decreasing the OAL, but then say note reduction in powder charge.
 
This is confusing me. You say keep the charge at 4.3 while decreasing the OAL, but then say note reduction in powder charge.
Yes, since 4.4 gr is max charge, you wouldn't want to use shorter than published OAL at 4.4 gr.

Instead, using reduced 4.3 gr charge with OAL reduction shorter than published 1.150" down to 1.135".

If accuracy trends, you may want to consider testing 4.2 gr with 1.135" or even 1.130".
 
BTW, Berry's plated bullets are sized larger at .356" (compared to .355" typical of jacketed bullets).

So I use .378" taper crimp with them to not cut into copper plating and not reduce bullet diameter. If you use too much taper crimp with plated bullets, you can reduce neck tension and decrease accuracy.
 
Yes, since 4.4 gr is max charge, you wouldn't want to use shorter than published OAL at 4.4 gr.

Instead, using reduced 4.3 gr charge with OAL reduction shorter than published 1.150" down to 1.135".

If accuracy trends, you may want to consider testing 4.2 gr with 1.135" or even 1.130".

Gotcha. So, am I correct in believing that the lower the OAL, the the lower the max becomes, and you should “go down the ladder” to figure out what that is? For instance, if 4.2 is the best at 1.150” then the lower I can go with that until it becomes the new max over say 4.3?
 
Powder charge reduction from published max depends on how much shorter you are below published OAL.

It is not an exact science but depending on powder burn rate and how short I am loading below published OAL (Actual focus on bullet seating depth, especially if using different bullet type than published load data), I usually reduce start/max charges by .2-.3 gr if working OAL/bullet seating depth is significantly shorter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top