packetloss
Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2020
- Messages
- 450
Sadly, this was the new batch they sent me after I complained about the first one......
Just wanted to make sure it wasn't me being a pain and that these were close enough to normal.
Let us know who the supplier is please. Might save someone some dough.
Load up a magazine with the ugly bullets and load up a magazine with the best looking bullets from the bunch. At the range grab a magazine without knowing whether it’s the good one or bad one and shoot a target. Load the next magazine without looking to see if which bullet it is and shoot another target. Can you tell any difference on the targets?
The coating on those is fine. It's the casting that's lacking.
One of my cheaper 6 cavity 45 cal molds won’t cut a clean sprue on the first three cavities and leaves a bit of “ flash” on the base of the bullet. When sized this flash gets formed back into a bit of a tail on the bullet. I’m simply not a good enough pistol shot shooting off hand at 25 yards to see any difference so I don’t cull those out when casting.Many of the bullets in a batch of hi-tek coated that I just got look like this. Are these ok to load or will all the extra malformed lead on the bottom greatly reduce accuracy and cause leading?
View attachment 923431
View attachment 923432
Pure speculation on my part, but guessing they came from a Vendor in TX,,,.
These are MBC Hi-Tek coated 9mm 124 gr RN and 40S&W 180 gr TCFP and they ship millions of bullets every month, just about the highest volume bullet caster in the country.Can someone post a picture of what a proper hi-tek coated one should look like (side and bottom)?